Evaluate a Debate like a Job Interview, not the Super Bowl

As soon as one cycle ends another begins as C-Span launches the latest "Road to the White House" installation. In the early stages the fields become so large and unwieldy that so-called debates involve selective one line opportunities with any effort to achieve substantive dialogue dead in arrival.
In the outdoor Democratic multi-participant "debate" at Chicago's Soldier Field earlier this year Chris Matthews became deeply immersed if, on a given point, the home team player, former Windy City community organizer and later state and U.S. Senator Obama or local Chicago suburbanite who had ultimately become a New York senator, Hillary Clinton, had prevailed.
Matthews and Pat Buchanan along with others on the panel debated the issue in a manner expected by an Al Michaels or John Madden discussing a potential winning drive for the New York Giants or New England Patriots in the Super Bowl. Buchanan concluded that Obama won the point by one measure and that Clinton prevailed by another barometer.
Wait... There's more! (1 comment, 726 words in story)



