Neocons Sought to Invade Iraq Before Bush and Cheney Assumed Office

Fleischer, former Bush-Cheney Press Secretary, in an appearance on Chris Matthews' "Hardball" on MSNBC, kept repeating in mantra fashion how fortunate Barack Obama is to have Saddam Hussein removed from Iraq. In the manner of neocon spin artists, his comments about the menace of Saddam and his removal were constantly linked to the necessity of making the world safer following 9/11.
Neocons have used 9/11 as a pretext for launching a regime from hell on scenes both foreign and domestic. Had it not been for Bush's failure to achieve "Mission Accomplished" in the timely manner that they had envisioned, who would seriously argue that Iran would have been next in prompt line for invasion.
Two resolute neocon media propagandists, William Kristol and George Will, were making the case for attacking Iran before America became bogged down in Iraq. Neocon fantasist were believing in their own invincible will to conquer would occur, and that Iraq would fall into line as a set of dominoes.
Wait... There's more! (632 words in story)
George Bush, Your Turn to Go to Iraq!

To say that these individuals were not "happy campers" would be a classic understatement. The first soldier, a corporal, complained about the unrealistic scheduling, and how it was impossible to obtain sufficient rest before going out on the next patrol.
At that point the African American soldier with whom the corporal was communicating made his feelings crystal clear. He tersely stated his willingness to make a compromise agreement extending his service, which he clearly despised.
The African American soldier declared that he would extend his Iraq service by 15 months at no additional pay if one condition could be met. The condition involved George W. Bush riding along with him on patrol for that entire period.
Wait... There's more! (2 comments, 668 words in story)
Is Our Children Employable?

In the new global order, Blinder writes, not just manufacturing jobs but a large number of service jobs will be performed in cheaper climes. Indeed, only hands-on or face-to-face services look safe. "Janitors and crane operators are probably immune to foreign competition," Blinder writes, "accountants and computer programmers are not."There follow some back-of-the-envelope calculations as Blinder totes up the number of jobs in tradable and non-tradable sectors. Then comes his (necessarily imprecise) bottom line: "The total number of current U.S. service-sector jobs that will be susceptible to offshoring in the electronic future is two to three times the total number of current manufacturing jobs (which is about 14 million)." As Blinder believes that all those manufacturing jobs are offshorable, too, the grand total of American jobs that could be bound for Bangalore or Bangladesh is somewhere between 42 million and 56 million. [emphasis mine] That doesn't mean all those jobs are going to be exported. It does mean that the Americans performing them will be in competition with people who will do the same work for a whole lot less.
Wait... There's more! (1164 words in story)



