Karl Rove and the Leak Case; Is Something Fundamental Missing Here?

The Weekly Standard's editor, Fred Barnes, could not contain his glee in stating that Rove's "vindication" was a blow to Democrats in the 2006 campaign and welcome news to the White House in particular and Republicans in general.
Barnes was correct as far as the political spin is concerned arising from Luskin's announcement, and politics is the area of the right wing Republican journalistic partisan's concern, which gives him something in common with Rove.
If there is one area where Karl Rove has made himself abundantly clear, it is in the all-important area of spin control and the valued place it holds in a Cheney-Bush political strategy context.
Wait... There's more! (2 comments, 977 words in story)
White House Seeks to Destroy Net Journalist

Instead of Luskin simply affirming or denying the report, Luskin was prepared to assassinate the messenger:
The "claim that President Bush's top political strategist had been indicted in the CIA leak investigation was written by a journalist who has battled drug addiction and mental illness and been convicted of grand larceny. That didn't stop more than 35 reporters -- from all the major newspapers, networks and newsmagazines -- from calling Luskin or Rove's spokesman, Mark Corallo, to check it out."
Seems Luskin did his homework before making his statement - and went a little bit overboard for a representative of an administration that has likely used such onine media outlets to their advantage in the past.
Perhaps Jason Leopold came a little closer to the truth that Luskin have would liked.
Luskin Confirms Rove a 'Subject' of Plamegate Investigation

In a breaking article today, reporter Jason Leopold managed to get Rove lawyer Robert Luskin on the record confirming that a Rove indictment remains a strong possibility:
Wait... There's more! (3 comments, 369 words in story)



