Sponsors

PoliCor Poll Email Print

We have over 600 registered users, so if you've been hiding in your Cortex closet, now is the time to time come out and vote! Better yet, share the reasons behind your answer.


KEYWORDS: ,

Sign up for a Complimentary Member Account... Join the community! It's fast. And it'll allow you to take advantage of all this site's great features!

Poll

Should the Dems define what they're FOR?
The Democratic Party should have a public mission statement 35%
The Democratic Party should continue to let the GOP hang itself 7%
I like both ideas. 57%

Votes: 40
Results | Other Polls
< Howard Dean defeats Ken Mehlman | Is It Possible To Be Too Open-minded? >
 Display:
We have over 600 registered users

Well, now you have 601. :-)

The hanging can continue a little while longer. Not that the Dems can be silent -- you know, once in a while shut down the Senate or something.

Soon Democrats will need to unveil some bold ideas, but for now they've been doing OK.

Dissent Protects Democracy

by cscs on 11/11/2005 05:16:56 PM EST

Make that 672.

Dissent Protects Democracy

by cscs on 11/11/2005 05:17:43 PM EST

[ Parent ]
And don't worry... the only numbers we're really concerned about are Democratic ones.

by S M Dixon on 11/11/2005 06:08:28 PM EST

[ Parent ]

Dissent Protects Democracy

by cscs on 11/12/2005 12:06:53 AM EST

[ Parent ]
We still vote Democratic (for the most part)...

Once in a while you get shown the light in the strangest of places if you look at it right

by darthstar on 11/15/2005 07:56:21 PM EST

[ Parent ]
My friend. A welcome "5" for you:)

Political Cortex -- Brain Food for the Body Politic

by Tom Ball on 11/11/2005 08:56:45 PM EST

[ Parent ]
... can we vote for both? Ha!

Many possibilities are open to you - work a little harder.

by Rainman on 11/11/2005 08:09:10 AM EST

I am pleased to see that I have roused you! Per your request I have added a third choice to the poll, but alas, if you have voted already, you can't vote again.

I know, I know, we should be allowed to vote early and often (it's not as if the damned Elephant Crowd hasn't rigged plenty of polls and elections), but I dont think there's a way to wipe the poll results and start it over from zero. If there IS a way, I know it not. Sorry.

:(

by S M Dixon on 11/11/2005 01:40:32 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Gives me goosebumps all over.

Seriously, I love the whole notion of "rabble" and being a part of the chaotic, free-wheeling, passionate mass of every-day humanity.

by SusanG on 11/11/2005 02:19:49 PM EST

[ Parent ]
"Denny Crane." I got Shirley Schmidt beat.

by S M Dixon on 11/11/2005 06:06:06 PM EST

[ Parent ]
It's a good idea to have a "Cortex Lounge" or other such free-form diary now and again, with a regular call for newcomers to come out, introduce themselves, and express their opinions.  Booman has the Froggy Bottom for this purpose.  Even Kos used to have something similar in the distant past.

Hmmm...  What to call this place?

"Welcome to the Brain Trust?"

by Devilstower on 11/11/2005 09:28:10 AM EST

Yeah, that's the ticket, Devilstower.

And btw, S. M., I wanted to vote for both options, too!!

You can't. :(

Taxes shall be levied according to ability to pay. That is the only American principle. FDR

by btyarbro on 11/11/2005 11:18:18 AM EST

[ Parent ]
The Brainiac Mojo Bar and Grille

The Albany Project. The best damned blog about New York State politics.

by NYBri on 11/11/2005 03:50:16 PM EST

[ Parent ]
I think for right now, I want the public focused on the corruption and national security risks this country is being subjected to by the GOP.

If there were only one scandal unfolding in the Republican Party, I'd probably advise the Dems coming up with their own "mission statement" right now. But there are a lot of areas of corruption -- the CIA leak, FEMA, DeLay, Frist -- and I want the public to take it ALL in while the Dems are organizing and honing their message.

Right now, I want the electorate focused on the ten-car pile-up going on in front of their eyes. Once they've seen enough, I want us to be ready to step up and offer concrete solutions.

And frankly, I'm not sure I trust the Dems -- without a WHOLE lot of thought -- to present a mission statement in language that will engage the electorate. I think they need some time to get their message machine together.

by SusanG on 11/11/2005 09:47:19 AM EST

That ten-car pile-up...

Let's find an image of one of the huge jack-knifed tractor trailer accidents followed by 30 smashed up cars. (I remember a massive one that had no injuries - the no injury part might be important.)

"This is Your Country on Republicans."  Nah, too many younguns won't remember the fried egg brains on drugs.

Okay....maybe..."This is what Republican rule does to a country."

Eh.  Too many words.

Image overlayed by the word "Republican Govenment".

"Republicans"?

Oh hell, let's go with the ten-car pile-up.

by ExcuseMeExcuseMe on 11/11/2005 10:07:51 AM EST

[ Parent ]
We have to do that--blame the republicans for their mess--without giving them an opening to just start blaming us for having nothing but a negative campaign.

I'm not sure if they could. Much of the public seems to recognize the corruption. But I fear that the republicans will jump at any chance thye have to start blaming democrats for . . . well, anything.

by astraea on 11/11/2005 12:43:13 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Democrats - or their spokespersons, as it were - responded to every Republican charge with as much vehemence and truth as Republicans tar Democrats with vehemence and fiction.

This is an old question but I'll ask it again - why is it that we minions all scream and flagellate the TV in response to Republican talking points and pure unadulterated bullshit, and the Dem reps on TV fold in on themselves?

They scream lies, we whimper in response.

I'm no genius, and I'm not even politically savvy - though I learned some ropes living in DC for 15 years - and if I have responses how is it possible that they never - or, rarely - have a cohesive response?  Huh?  

It's a rhetorical question, I think.

by ExcuseMeExcuseMe on 11/11/2005 01:00:14 PM EST

[ Parent ]
I don't get it. I'm hoping the excited response from rank-and-file to recent events, the closed session of the Senate, etc, will encourage more of that toughness.

I hate to say it, but Republicans are often just more hard-nosed in politics on all sorts of levels.

There's a diary over at Kos now (here) about how there are 70 seats in Congress where Republicans are (so far), running UNOPPOSED. Horrific.

I'm in one of those districts (PA-15). Dent (republican) is my rep. I'm going to contact the local Democratic organizations and see what the hell is going on.

I'm not sure if there are any Democrats running unopposed.

by astraea on 11/11/2005 01:19:08 PM EST

[ Parent ]
i really hate alliteration, but...

"Republican Rule: the Road to Ruin"?

by birdbrain64 on 11/11/2005 03:44:20 PM EST

[ Parent ]
If we come out with a mission statement now, we'll be changing the subject and it will become about how our statement sucks and now the Republican corruption.

The Albany Project. The best damned blog about New York State politics.

by NYBri on 11/11/2005 03:48:16 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Geesh!  Political Cortex is PoliCor already?  If it gets further shortened it will end up being PC, or the PC that is not PC.

Has anyone ever wondered if we will ultimately speak in acronyms?  No more words? A new parlor game! If two people can have a 5 minute discussion using only acronyms, they win!  I think I'll try it.

Okay, Alex, I'll take "A blog area for lighthearted banter and less than a diary".

What is "Just Below the Surface"?

Cortex?  Surface?

Okay, I tried.

I'm working on my intro, I swear I am.

by ExcuseMeExcuseMe on 11/11/2005 09:55:44 AM EST

PC is not an acronym, neither is FBI, CIA, or 90% of the other things that people call "three letter acronyms."

LASAR is an acronym.  RADAR is an acronym.  SCUBA is an acronym.

This message brought to you by the utterly pedantic and excessively picky members of the Association of English Majors.  When you really want to bore someone, call on an English major.

by Deetoo on 11/11/2005 01:03:43 PM EST

[ Parent ]
I guess this is where I hide my head in shame, being an English major and all.

I love being pedantic and excessively picky.  It actually served me well in my former career.

Thanks for the reminder.

by ExcuseMeExcuseMe on 11/11/2005 01:09:15 PM EST

[ Parent ]
I used to be a copyeditor. I love nitpicking ("commas inside quotation marks" "hyphenate this" "don't hyphenate that").  Just love it.

Then I get REALLY embarrassed when I spell something wrong or mess up in some other way.

by astraea on 11/11/2005 01:32:24 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Thirty-one novels, and I still don't know how to use a comma, I'll never get it straight between "farther" and "further," and I absolutely resign myself to never using a semicolon.

I've driven many a copyeditor to tears.

by Devilstower on 11/11/2005 03:33:46 PM EST

[ Parent ]
When you really want to bore someone, call on an English major.

Or, you can call on one of those elitist, "librul" English professors.

blush.

Yep. I confess.

Taxes shall be levied according to ability to pay. That is the only American principle. FDR

by btyarbro on 11/11/2005 02:11:42 PM EST

[ Parent ]
for $1000.

Oh, hell, make it the "Daily Double."

[I love Jeopardy!]

And your comments.

We like to call ourselves Cortexans (so different from the current resident "root"), but I get what you're sayin' about the language.

Aren't WORDS fun???? And also confusing, maddening, frustrating, creative, obfuscating, powerful, um, um, . . .

I think we're stuck with acronyms being incorporated into the language, but not replacing the lexicon in all its glorious flexibility, strength, and endurance.

Taxes shall be levied according to ability to pay. That is the only American principle. FDR

by btyarbro on 11/11/2005 11:28:29 AM EST

[ Parent ]
that I visited your Iraq site.

This is an important timeline, and a good site. Hope you'll stay on it!

And post a diary here on it. :~)

Taxes shall be levied according to ability to pay. That is the only American principle. FDR

by btyarbro on 11/11/2005 12:39:48 PM EST

[ Parent ]
I've tried to push "Cortexan" as much as possible -- thinking it was a slap in the face of our transplanted prezident -- but then I guess that's like some goofy kid trying to choose his own nickname -- or like George Castanza trying to convince people that he should be known as T-Bone.

Gotta be careful:(

Political Cortex -- Brain Food for the Body Politic

by Tom Ball on 11/11/2005 08:53:28 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Anything Texas-related gives me the heebie jeebies. I guess these things just evolve naturally. Or maybe I'll give evolution a hand with another poll...

Moo-hoo-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha!

by S M Dixon on 11/11/2005 11:31:22 PM EST

[ Parent ]
on "courtesan," but the effort was breaking my brain and I gave up.

by SusanG on 11/11/2005 11:39:39 PM EST

[ Parent ]
for tomorrow's Cortexan;) Lounge!

Political Cortex -- Brain Food for the Body Politic

by Tom Ball on 11/12/2005 12:12:28 AM EST

[ Parent ]
PoliCor sounds like some kind of medical product to me. I immediately thought of Polident, or whatever that denture stuff is. BAD image. And PC won't quite work because so many people dislike the whole politically correct business. In many circles it's just a joke.

When I talk about the site I usually just call it Cortex.

On words:
the plural of cortex is "cortices"
corticate, adjective., having a cortex
corticated, adjective. = corticate.
corticoid, noun, adjective. = corticosteroid.
corticose, adjective., of or like cortex; having a cortex

by astraea on 11/11/2005 01:03:37 PM EST

The "Cortexicans" that someone suggested in another topic was very cute.

by Deetoo on 11/11/2005 01:07:13 PM EST

[ Parent ]
I live in Florida (don't ask) and I can't bend Cortex anywhere near Florida.

On the other hand, when living in Florida amidst the bugs Cortisone comes in quite handy.

Isn't that a derivative of that PoliCor drug?  

by ExcuseMeExcuseMe on 11/11/2005 01:14:21 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Flortex or Cortida?

Political Cortex -- Brain Food for the Body Politic

by Tom Ball on 11/11/2005 08:54:34 PM EST

[ Parent ]
A public mission statement is that people tie you to it for good or for ill. Kind of like Pro-Choice getting firmly attached to the abortion issue when (at least for Dems) it's really about privacy including a woman's right to choose what happens to her own body. Or how Democrats somehow got labelled as "anti-religion" when, in fact, that isn't true at all. Seperation of church and state, yes, but not anti-religion. That needs to be changed as well.

So I chose to vote "Both"...let the Rethugs hang themselves, but use this time to come up with something that people can grasp easily, yet won't shackle us to one potentially divisive issue. "The Democratic Party - Making America Better for All Americans." I know that's a slogan, but it could be the basis for a mission statement, yes?

by PatsBard on 11/12/2005 02:20:34 AM EST

The dems shouldn't wait for the reps to continue their self-destruction. The reps have shown in the past they find ways to take the attention away. The media cannot be trusted to inform, and when something isn't in the news the masses soon forget.

I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than those attending too small a degree of it.~~Thomas Jefferson~~

by FLwalker on 11/13/2005 11:23:48 AM EST

Oliver Willis wrote this many months ago, it is extremely relevant now:

I think every Democrat needs to read this and take it to heart:

It's time for Democrats running for office in 2006 to understand what they're running against and running for.

You're running against the Washington Republicans. Whether you're a challenger or an incumbent, you're running against the Washington Republicans and their total inability to work for America. The Washington Republicans are everything we hate about politicians - partisan, greedy, and elitist.

Washington Republicans like Tom DeLay and Bill Frist, take expensive trips paid for by big-money lobbyists on taxpayer time. When they should be working on securing America, preserving social security, and cutting taxes - they're focused on going on expensive golf trips and hanging out smoking cigars on tropical islands. The Washington Republicans are just out of touch with average Americans.

You (the Democratic candidate), on the other hand, is going to Washington (or working in Washington) to stick up for the regular folks, to stand up for a safer America, preserve social security, and increased income. By electing Democrats, and throwing out the Washington Republicans, voters can finally get things done.
Democratic candidates are not running against George Bush, but the combination of George Bush and the Washington Republicans. They are all part and parcel of the same inside-the-beltway malady. President Bush is a lame duck, while the congress is obsessed with partisan bickering. They represent an ideology outside of the mainstream that proposes silly notions like cutting social security benefits and underfunding education. That's just crazy, especially at a time when America needs more than ever to be able to compete in the global economy. America needs to elect Democratic candidates to get us back on top, to create jobs for small and big business alike, to educate our kids so that they can beat the rest of the world, and to make it so that no terrorist or rogue government can ever threaten us again.

Democrats are running against Washington Republicans, in order to get things done.

  • The Washington Republicans do not share the values of regular working Americans.

  • While Democrats have tried to lower the cost of health care, protect social security from privatization, and defend our country from terrorists. The Washington Republicans have been on a campaign to inject themselves into your personal decisions, ruin social security, and to obstruct vital medical research that could save millions of lives.

  • President Bush is a lame duck, flailing to remain relevant as the radical right cements control over the Republicans.

  • Democrats are the only choice to keep America secure, protect your retirement, and look out for the common sense values of America's families.

  • Tom DeLay and the Washington Republicans are out of touch with average Americans, obsessed with making money for themselves rather than working on our behalf.

  • Only by voting for you, a representative of regular people, can we send a message to the Washington Republicans: stop working for fatcat lobbyists and breaking the rules, and start doing the people's work.

KICKING RETHUGS TO THE CURB IS WHAT I LIVE FOR!

by rduckham on 11/14/2005 01:02:48 PM EST

We have allowed the neos to frame everything for too long; we should not have them to frame at all, really!  Where they offer fear we should offer hope--make a stand, in other words.  Meanwhile, let them continue to hang themselves.

by Roni on 11/17/2005 02:01:23 AM EST

 Display: