Sponsors

In Case You Hadn't Noticed, We Are At War Email Print

I'm not quite sure how or when it happened.  Not too long ago, all I heard was how the Democrats didn't have balls, how they were too timid to speak up, how they failed to capitalize on Bush's mistakes.  

Something happened.  Maybe they switched to Wheaties at the Democratic Caucus breakfasts.  I don't know quite what happened, all I know is that something did indeed occur, and the Democrats declared war.

A tiny part of me thinks it has something to do with the flak the Democrats were taking from the blogosphere.  Another part of me says that at some point, even the cornered animal begins to snarl back. And so it happened.  A sneak attack, really.  The Democrats let the first blows be caused by Bush's own hand.  They were  relatively silent as the Bush administration bungled the Katrina response. They hid in their bunkers, untempted by the media's coaxing, unswayed by the Tweety and Russerts of the press asking "Where are the Democrats?"

They did not share in Cindy Sheehan's spotlight; they sunk into the shadows and watched from afar as she eroded Bush's approval numbers,  point by point by point.

They did not hound the airwaves on Fitzmas day, when Libby was indicted.  And again, the media noted, time and time again, the conspicious silence of the Democrats.  

And it wasn't until days later, that the Democrats attacked.  Their weapon of choice: Rule 21. And that single ploy began the war, and we find ourselves now entrenched in it.

Do you doubt it? Do you doubt the weight of what is occuring around us?  Democrats, in the minority, have relentlessly attacked the President for his manipulation of pre-war intelligence.  The President, in return, has launched a counter-offensive calling into question not only the character, by the patriotism of Democratic members of Congress.  

Verbal bullets are being shot on both sides of the aisle.  The Democratic rhetoric is measured, but stern.  The Republicans have been caught off gaurd, and don't know what to do or say.

So we have McCain calling Democrats "liars." Yes, he used the "l" word. We have O'Reilly wishing a terrorist attack upon American soil. We have all of Wingnuttia franticly running around, blinded by our burst of courage, hands reaching out wildly for any talking points to guide them through this battle.

This is a battle.  If you have not seen Harry Reid in a press conference, make sure to catch the next one. If you have not watched Kennedy and Kerry on the Senate floor, do it. Do it now.  Because listening to the Democratic leaders for even a few seconds will reveal that this is not ordinary politics.

This is war.  This is a war not only for the truth, but for the life of our party and its values.  The media is playing this new-found Democratic courage as a political game, a way to score points against the President. But it goes beyond that.  Democrats aren't fighting now to see their poll numbers go up. They aren't doing it because that's what expected. They aren't speaking out because they like the cameras or have Presidential ambitions. They are fighting now because they finally realized that our values are worth fighting for.

If we do not protect our liberal values, they will be destroyed by our enemies.  We've seen that happen already to some extent.  Protecting peace became emboldening the enemy.   Exposing government corruption became treason. Saving the middle class became communism. Our Democratic values were no longer our own.

Reid and Pelosi and the rest of the Democrats, for some reason or another, have finally awakened from their stupor and realized that they were confronted with a choice:  fight now, or sacrifice our values forever.

Our leaders have chosen to fight. I cannot emphasize what courage this has taken. We are the minority. We have the media against us.  The only thing on our side in this fight for America's soul is the will of the masses and the truth. Armed with both, there is no doubt this Presidency will suffer.

Events will intensify.  The Bush administration, faced with its demise, will fight, and will fight dirty. But the Democrats cannot turn back now. They cannot retreat, they must not accept any concessions. We have the enemy  on its knees; Republicans are already capitulating on Gitmo, on the Wildlife Refuge, on Social Security. The issue now is one of endurance.

Let us not lose this battle cry we've heard now. Let us keep it going, rolling month after month, piling truth upon truth until the weight of all its wrong crushes this Administration, and the GOP along with it.

2006 is on the horizon.  We can win the battle then. And in 2008, we can win the war, the Presidency, and finally the power to set this nation back on track again.


KEYWORDS: ,

Sign up for a Complimentary Member Account... Join the community! It's fast. And it'll allow you to take advantage of all this site's great features!

< Bush, Baghdad Bob and the Tipping Point | On Language and Responsibility: A Progressive View >
 Display:
At last the generals seem to have an Ops plan!  The turning around, pulling out the sword, and swinging it around sometimes gives you a few seconds to make a plan, and our generals got that time with rule 21.  Pelosi is delivering a big part of the Ops plan with  her speech today.  Unfortunately, Dems, who are best at actually governing, have to become warriors in order to save this country.  Let's just hope, that unlike the Republicans, who when they won, just kept on fighting, we will be able to again govern with our usual messy expertise.

Thank you for creating this blog.  I'll try to be a useful member of the Politcal Cortex community.

by dksbook on 11/15/2005 01:55:23 PM EST

Democrats in congress noticed we were winning.  No, not "we" as in Democrats including them, but "we" as in progressives outside the beltway.  

They noticed an odd thing happening.  No matter how much the insiders clung to the supposed "safe" positions close to Bush, they kept losing ground.  And those "dangerous" positions looked a little less dangerous with every passing poll.

When they finally noticed that they were all crowded together on a little sinking raft, while the S.S. You've Been Played For Fools was steaming past, a few of them started to jump ship.  Then a few more.

by Devilstower on 11/15/2005 03:38:33 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Do you believe that it comes down to safe and dangerous?

I was sincerely hoping that it would rise up to the level of right and wrong...moral and unethical.

If we are to condescend to acceptance of safe and dangerous as arbitors of action or inaction, then we are just as bad as our half-baked representatives.

Expect more, be more.  

Representative government should be about the "we" of the constituency, not the me of the politician or the influence of the corporation.  And government as a social structure needs to be more about doing what is right for the country, not about the expectations of party.

Claws beat skin! I want my America back.

by polydactyl on 11/15/2005 04:16:51 PM EST

[ Parent ]
I'm saying that the political types didn't jump to the good side of the force because it was clearly the side of growth, good feelings, and Yoda.  They jumped because the dark side started looking scary.

It would be nice to think they all had a sudden bout of morality.  However, I think a sudden ability to read the polls is more likely.

by Devilstower on 11/15/2005 04:19:45 PM EST

[ Parent ]
I am thankful for the clarification and the chuckle :-), but poll-jumping doesn't really win the heart and mind of this voter.

I am with you in spirit, devilstower, but we need more than fair-weather representation.

This "fight" is about changing our country's course for the long haul and it will take true-believers, geniune statesmen, honest and forthright Americans to bring it about.

Claws beat skin! I want my America back.

by polydactyl on 11/15/2005 04:37:53 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Aside from my personal outrage at the deeds of this administration, my single biggest beef is not feeling like I am the constituency that the Congress is representing.

Do I correspond with my representatives?  Yes, on almost a weekly basis.  Do I write LTE's when my dander gets up?  Yes.  Does it seem to have any impact on the voting behavior of my congressional representatives?  No!  

But, the bigger question is do I honestly believe that my representatives hold as their own core values:  torture, the raping of our environment, the decimation of our public school or health care systems?

I don't.  I really don't.  But I also can't quite wrap my brain around why the representatives and senators from Louisiana would march lock step with this administration or with their corporate constituency, when as a state and as a people, we come up on the short end of the stick at crunch time.

Most recently, Sen. Landrieu was one of the only democrats in the Senate that backed the Graham amendment stripping the right of habeus corpus.  My disgust with her renders me speechless.  She has a long history of voting with this administration even on matters that fly directly in the face of her local constituency.  And to what effect, this loyalty?

Senator Vitter, the junior republican in the delegation has voted the straight party line during his short tenure and even went as far as to defend the administration and the "burdens of FEMA" in the wake of this year's hurricanes.  And yet, what has this loyalty to party over constituency gotten him?  Or us?  Has his loyalty so much as earned careful consideration by the house and senate of the rebuilding of the levee and coastal protection systems?  No.  Does he puff out his chest and speak to his republican peers about the necessity of dealing with these questions sooner than later?  No.  He soft-peddles half-assed, compromises instead of solutions and regurgitates a "Katrina fatigue" excuse.

Then, there is Rep. Rodney Alexander.  Elected as a democrat, voted lock-step with this administration.  Our district did not feel like we were being represented during his first term.  Then, hours before the close of filing during the next cycle, he changed party affiliations essentially locking out the republican challenger and leaving no time for a democrat to file in opposition.  Is this representative government?  I think not.  This is playing at politics.

I have been heartened by the recent bold leadership that Reid has offered.  I have cheered the speeches in the house and senate that call for this administration to be held accountable.  But, why should I applaud them as a trend, a new wave, the emergence of the 'fighting dems', when this is their job?

To be fair, I do reward outstanding statesmanship with email and LTE's. And, I do communicate my intentions prior to important votes.  I just find that regardless of how much effort I put in to being an active part of my own government, that the response is half-baked.

Why don't we expect all of this and more?  Why do the democrats in Congress, and the moderate republicans for that matter, feel that they have to parse their words, maintain scrupulous political correctness and decorum on the floor, when they are faced with lies, corruption and dirty tricks?

It is nice for the 'fighting dems' to have this newly found boldness, but isn't it about time?  Shouldn't we demand this and more?  Is it not more than just about righting the wrongs and changing the course of our nation, but about bringing the "we the people" and human moral decency back to America and our government?

Claws beat skin! I want my America back.

by polydactyl on 11/15/2005 03:50:34 PM EST

 Display: