Sponsors

Tectonic Shift Taking Place Email Print

The blogs are all talking about defense hawk and Democratic Congressman Murtha's statements that the war should be over and the troops brought home.
The war in Iraq is not going as advertised.  It is a flawed policy wrapped in illusion.  The American public is way ahead of us.   The United States and coalition troops have done all they can in Iraq, but it is time for a change in direction.  Our military is suffering.  The future of our country is at risk.  We can not continue on the present course.   It is evident that continued military action in Iraq is not in the best interest of the United States of America, the Iraqi people or the Persian Gulf Region. 

This comes hot on the heels of John Edwards and John Kerry admitting their war votes were a mistake (albeit a year late), and collapsing public opinion on the war and the reasons that led us there.

I think 3 things are primarily responsible for this on going and fast moving change.

1. The war isn't going well - its a quagmire with no end in sight and no plan
2. Cindy Sheehan. She made the scarifies our men and women in uniform were making personal, and was one of the first people to attempt to hold the President accountable in a highly public manner, with her weeks long vigil at his Crawford pig farm Ranch back in August.
3. Finally, Paul Hackett in the Ohio 2nd special election earlier this year. An Iraq war vet hitting the GOP hard on the war Issue, using his service and common sense to add weight.

While other Democrats certainly opposed the war, and some voted against it (including Sherrod Brown) few have had the courage to talk boldly about the failure, especially during an election (Dennis Kucinich comes to mind from Ohio). Hackett's efforts along with Sheehan's and the ongoing quagmire helped shift the debate, and the political momentum, and now with the likes of Murtha piling on there seems little doubt that the flood gates are about to open.

A mention should also go to Chuck Hagel who has taken a courageous stance against the war. Hagel, Murtha and Hackett - the connection ? All wore the uniform and served. these guys talk from experience and their opinions carry real weight, more weight than those who attack them, as Murtha pointedly proved
Murtha on Cheney: "I like guys who've never been there that criticize us who've been there. I like that. I like guys who got five deferments and never been there and send people to war, and then don't like to hear suggestions about what needs to be done."
Which all kinda reminds me of this
On ABC on Sunday, reporter Geoff Morrell recited how Hackett denounced Bush as a "chicken hawk" and "the biggest threat to America," but instead of describing that as mudslinging, Morrell called it "candor," relaying: "If elected, Hackett says he'll use that same candor to educate Congress about what's really going on in Iraq." On Saturday, CBS's Drew Levinson touted Hackett as "a tough talker" who "goes as far as saying President Bush is a greater threat to U.S. security than Osama bin Laden." Tuesday on CNN, Bruce Morton noted how Hackett's attacks on Bush have "angered some Republicans," but highlighted how one "Vietnam vet, who voted for Bush, is having second thoughts." NBC's Carl Quintanilla plugged Hackett as what "some call a next generation Democrat" and asserted that "analysts like Stu Rothenberg say there may be fallout even if Hackett finishes a close second."
Starting to look like a lot of old Democrats are beginning to act like next generation ones.

KEYWORDS: , ,

Sign up for a Complimentary Member Account... Join the community! It's fast. And it'll allow you to take advantage of all this site's great features!

< Randi Rhodes Needs to Shut the F#ck Up. | Michael Moore Liberals >
 Display:
...not Democrats not already on board with Out Now have joined Murtha. Indeed, Pelosi and Rahm Emmanuel put some distance between the Congressman and themselves.

by Meteor Blades on 11/18/2005 01:29:57 PM EST

and its not yet clear if the wind they are feeling is a prevailing wind or a momentary gust.

by Frederick Clarkson on 11/19/2005 08:08:06 AM EST

[ Parent ]
Like your take, as usual.  (Over on DKos you know me as YellowDogSammy.)  As to Hackett, although he is appropriately critical of the handling of the war, isn't it true that he opposes a rapid pullout?  I'm not sure he's lined up with Murtha on this.

Speaking of Murtha, I read or heard somewhere that behind the scenes he made it clear that he didn't want anyone from the left wing of the party jumping out to support him right away ... he thought that might blunt his impact with moderates and conservatives.

by JeffC on 11/22/2005 05:19:10 PM EST

 Display: