Sponsors

Fruit from a Poisoned Tree: Sen. Majority Leader Bill Frist Betrays Public Again Email Print

Yet again, Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist has raised his sword for Big Healthcare at patients' expense.  This time, Frist aims to shield vaccine manufacturers from liability for injuries caused by bird-flu and Anthrax shots.  

Instead of sponsoring legislation in the sunshine, Frist snuck provisions into a spending bill.

Frist's deceptiveness is no surprise, starting at least as far back as med-school, when he took animals from shelter under the pretense of "adopting" them but instead used them in fatal experiments.

Like fruit from a poisoned tree, Frist's political success is inextricably tied to HCA, the family business that became the nation's largest for-profit hospital chain.  HCA stock worth at least $11 million comprised a substantial chunk of his wealth, enabling Frist to spend $1.2 million from his own pocket for his first senatorial campaign.

HCA's fruit was similarly poisoned, with profits stemming from years of crimes and civil infractions that cost the taxpayers millions.

Founded by Frist's father and brother in the 1960s, HCA became America's largest for-profit hospital chain after merging with Columbia Healthcare in 1994.  Bill Frist didn't work for HCA but did own HCA stock worth millions before dumping it earlier this year.  He also received dividends from HCA exceeding $250,000 from 1998-2002, giving him a personal stake in the family business's bottom line.

HCA excelled at setting records.  In the `90s, the company came under the largest healthcare-fraud investigation in Justice Department history.  It lasted years and involved FBI raids on HCA hospitals.

To make multiple cases go away, HCA agreed to pay the largest healthcare-fraud settlement in Justice Department history ($1.7 billion).  Senator Chuck Grassley publicly questioned whether the settlement was too small, compared to the amount of money HCA had taken from the taxpayers.

The case was quietly settled while Frist was securing votes to become majority leader, about a month before HCA execs were scheduled for depositions.

Multiple HCA subsidiaries pled guilty to crimes.  The "sweetheart" settlements kept some executives out of jail and allowed HCA to continue feeding at Medicare's trough.  More than one-third of HCA's profits came from Medicare billing.

HCA systematically drained hundreds-of-millions from our nation's largest healthcare programs, including Medicaid, Medicare and TRICARE (military health).

One scheme was called "upcoding"(billing the government for more-expensive ailments than patients actually had).  The scheme was low-risk, because the government couldn't monitor all patients' actual conditions.

Another involved billing the government for lab tests that doctors hadn't ordered or that weren't medically necessary.

Yet another involved kickbacks paid to doctors for referring government-insured patients to HCA facilities.  Kickbacks were illegal under Medicare's Anti-Kickback statute, but what better way to increase HCA's billing?

In a nutshell, lucrative legal infractions were not uncommon for Frist's family business.

Even before merging with Columbia, HCA allegedly kept two sets of books for Medicare and Medicaid billing.  One contained unallowable costs billed to the government.  The other showed how much HCA would have to pay back if government auditors spotted those "costs."

After the merger, Columbia/HCA's strategy included buying hospitals and slashing staff to boost profits.  Reportedly, the quality of patient care suffered.

According to the Polaris Institute, a former HCA obstetrician reported increased childbirth-related deaths after Columbia/HCA bought the hospital where he worked.  A technician at another HCA hospital said that she, alone, sometimes had to watch 72 patients' heart monitors due to staff shortages.

Under-staffed hospitals are breeding grounds for legitimate malpractice suits.

Now sweat for the family business: Senator Frist raised his sword for tort "reform," to limit damages rightly owed by hospitals that put profits above patients.

According to LA Weekly, Frist also fought against allowing patients to sue HMOs and tacked a rider onto a Homeland Security bill to shield Eli Lilly from lawsuits over Thimerosal (a mercury-based vaccine-preservative that may cause autism in children).

In short, Senator Frist has a history of defending Big Health at citizens' expense, which is why his moves to protect vaccine manufacturers are not surprising.

What is surprising is that the dirt-hungry media has forgotten Frist's and his family-business's history---though both are key to understanding this man who may still by eyeing a Whitehouse run in 2008.


KEYWORDS: , , , , , ,

Sign up for a Complimentary Member Account... Join the community! It's fast. And it'll allow you to take advantage of all this site's great features!

< Woodward or Pincus Headed for Jail | A Woodward Roundup >
 Display:
Bottom line: The #1 person in the Senate is a crook and a thief who uses that position to perpetrate more crookedness.

And has an eye on the White House.

And will use his campaign to get to the WH by selling to the public that his policies are really for their own good.  

ACK!

All it takes to fly is to hurl yourself at the ground... and miss. (Douglas Adams)

by scoophound on 11/19/2005 01:08:20 PM EST

If I hadn't had to exceed 300 words, I would have put it the way you did.

by D Cupples on 11/19/2005 11:16:25 PM EST

[ Parent ]
You have over 20 links to support your case that HCA is an evil corporation. That is only useful to the extent that the sins of the father can be visited upon the son. If you focused on the FTC investigation into conflict of interest and insider trading, that would be more compelling.

You do not explore why there might be a shortage of supply, or a compelling public interest in encouraging manufacturers to produce vaccines. Your reference to Thimerosal is one of the examples why they might be reluctant to produce a risky product.

I didn't recomend, I didn't not recomend either. You obviously did a lot of work on a subject important to you, it's just not my style.

by roysol on 11/21/2005 12:09:44 PM EST

Thanks for taking the time.

by D Cupples on 11/21/2005 02:25:27 PM EST

[ Parent ]
I'll be glad to up-rate you next time we agree, (which we will).

by roysol on 11/21/2005 02:46:44 PM EST

[ Parent ]
 Display: