Sponsors

Midterm / Open Convention Email Print

It's been two weeks now since Walter Cronkite's NYTletter suggesting that the dems convene a midterm convention.  dKos' SneakySnu posted a diary that caught a lot of attention, and made it onto the rec'd lists.  SneakySnu was credited at a lot of the VLWC blogs with drawing attention to this.

So, where are we?  What's the BW (blogosphere wisdom - not common at all) about this idea?  Below the fold is a rundown of the dKos diaries I turned up as well as some links from around the web discussing a midterm convention.  I believe that some form of convention would offer a huge boost to the party, and do lots to improve our chances both in '06 and in '08.  What do you think?  What kind of convention do you want to see?

Here are the major discussions I've found on the midterm convention.   At the bottom, I'll lay out a few of the common threads I've seen in these discussions.

Madcasey - diary w/ petition calling for a midterm convention and a strong opposition party.

CMKay - suggestion for an online convention (crossposted to My Left Wing)

Stirling Newberry - We Can Do Better:  2006 Open Convention.  Stirling is arguing for what he calls an "Open Convention".  He suggests a series of regional/local events to 'design' the platform, culminating in a national event to ratify and kick it into action.  IMHO, that's a great way to go, and overcomes many of the biggest objections raised elsewhere.
Stirling at BopNews
We Can do Better
The Open Convention for 2006

EBGill- In the context of a midterm convention, discusses what sounds like a charrette model of developing and building consensus on a platform.  I think the charrette idea could be applied very effectively to building a platform.  Anyone have experience with this?

My own diaries arguing that Bush is a lame duck, that Americans' lack of support for his administration means we should treat his retirement as a fait accompli' and that we can demonstrate our leadership by making a public bid now to select a new President.  
The Time to Begin is Now
The more concisely put,  Starting Now

Around the blogs:

MyDD - Scott Shields on the Cronkite LTE
Fleshed out here, with a good list of ground rules to make a convention successful, including:
 * Introducing our candidates...
 * Making the case for our platform...
 * Show that we're a big tent party...
 * Not just a cheerleading session...
 * Democrats in action...
 * No cost to the host site...
 * Run a tight ship...
 * Be honest...

TPM - Picks up on the Cronkite LTE,  especially see the comment by American Dreamer

Alternet- Tom Cosgrove, calling for the Midterm Convention in a letter to Chairman Dean, in order to develop and communicate The Big Ideas

Democrats.com- some discussion on the topic

Media Matters - Offers a note of caution against being too specific, too soon in our proposals.  They note that the Republicans didn't unveil their Contract on America until just two months before the '94 election..

And this via Political Wire:  Robert Reich in 2001 discussed a midterm convention.  I think he had some very cogent points to make about the idea that are even more pertinent today.  

Democratic activists are pushing for a midterm convention next summer. The party hasn't met at midterm for more than two decades. But activists make a convincing case for rallying the troops next year before the 2002 midterm elections and using the occasion to articulate a new progressivism for America.
...
Finally, a midterm convention would enable activists to take the measure of potential presidential candidates for the 2004 race before the candidates begin rounding up money and locking in squads of campaign consultants and pollsters. Anyone even thinking about a run will want to attend and make a pitch because the race to become the Democrats' standard-bearer begins in earnest in 2002. By the time the 2004 convention rolls around, it will be over. Unless activists use a midterm convention to gauge prospective candidates, the next Democratic presidential candidate will be selected, in effect, by the party financiers who bankroll the primary campaigns.

Also, bunches of local blogs and community sites at least mentioned the Cronkite piece, available via google.

Common Threads:


      1 Pretty consistent agreement with the general concept, with the occasional voice arguing it just can't be done.

      2 A recurring call for openness and the widest participation possible.  A common reaction to the idea of the midterm convention is that folks don't want the same old professional politicians to be spouting the same old platitudes.  

      3 A call for the party to get down to business and communicate our ideals, coupled with a sense that the Republicans have been consistently better at articulating their core ideals that we have. (nothing new there!)


I put this together in hopes of moving the discussion on a convention past the Fitzmas Flurries, Scalito, Give 'em Hell Harry, etc.  I couldn't be more gratified than to have someone more eloquent than I am, and with more time on their hands, take this up and really push it here.  (yes that's a call for volunteers!)    I'll leave you with this quote from Scott Shields' post, and my questions for the VLWC community:


If something like this is going to happen, it's not going to be because some blogger said it was a good idea. It'll happen because you demanded it.


      1 Would some form of convention be of benefit to us strategically?
      2 If yes, what form should that convention take?  Single event,  multiple fora locally organized, regional events, some combination of these?
      3 How can we best create the momentum behind the idea to make it happen?
      4 Are you 'in' for helping with #3?


Look for more tomorrow - I have it on good authority that at least one prominent blogger will be publishing more on the topic.

Crossposted on Big Orange - I had a heck of a time chopping out the extra html tags that got inserted when I pasted over my text to tweak it for here.  Apologies if anything's haywire!


KEYWORDS: , ,

Sign up for a Complimentary Member Account... Join the community! It's fast. And it'll allow you to take advantage of all this site's great features!

Poll

Our Midterm Convention
Should be held in 2006 100%
Should not be held at all 0%
Should be a distributed, local series of events 66%
Should be one big National hurrah 33%
Should serve Pie 33%

Votes: 3
Results | Other Polls
< Fighting the Red Faith | Cutting Big Government >
 Display:
I've been advocating the idea of "open source politics" for months now.  I think what Meteor Blades, Jerome a Paris, and I have been doing on energy policy is one good example, and I see no reason why other issues can't be run through the same wringer.

Let's not wait for some convention to get these issues worked through.  Let's make proposals, take critique, make counter proposals, and work out the details day by day.

By the time it comes to a convention, we should have 90% of our goals worked out -- and worked out in a forum that's open to more people than any physical convention will ever be.

by Devilstower on 11/02/2005 04:05:02 PM EST

Devilstower, what you three are doing is vitally necessary.  The fact that you're doing it in public is part of what distinguishes us from the right,and I couldn't be more excited about it.  

But what I'm arguing for could serve to complement what you are doing.  The approach to a convention that I'd like to see is very distributed.  I want to see each state hold a forum (or several),  where the issues and the values of the party are hammered out and discussed.  They would be an opportunity for those within the party who want to demonstrate their leadership abilities and their vision of what the party should be to do so.  I'm talking about bringing block and ward captains and grassroots volunteers together with the '06 midterm candidates as well as the people who plan to run in '08.  Your energy policy should be a part of this as well.  
We bring everybody into the discussion, and in doing so, we reinforce the image of the party as the one that listens to the people, that Works, all while openly and very publicly criticizing the failure of conservative policies.  

2008 Presidential Primaries. STARTING NOW

by Austin in PA on 11/02/2005 04:26:24 PM EST

[ Parent ]
I'd like to see both, but I'd like to see us making more use of the online forums to work out the broad strokes of policy.

I've gone through hundreds of business analysis sessions, and there's nothing worse than setting down with someone who says "we're starting with a blank sheet of paper."  They might as well be saying "we're here to waste your time."

Let's get the basics down and know the boundaries of these discussions, so we can really make profitable use of our time together.

by Devilstower on 11/05/2005 03:50:22 PM EST

[ Parent ]
...the Yearly kos convention might be a good place to have this discussion. It's in June of 2006 and there will be venues to hold these kinds of discussions with lots of press and coverage.

Just sayin'...

The Albany Project. The best damned blog about New York State politics.

by NYBri on 11/05/2005 01:16:28 PM EST

The national party and all the state parties already have platforms. The last thing we need is a bunch of well-intentioned wordy wonks putting together more manifestos that end up being unsatisfying and unhelpful compromise documents that no one supports and are soon forgotten.

I vastly prefer what Devilstower & co are doing. Putting together really good policy papers worthy of discussion.

We really don't need hundreds of people getting together like a vast editorial committee.

Ughh. Stirling has lost his marbles.

by Lekker on 11/11/2005 06:34:19 PM EST

 Display: