Sponsors

Executive Order 12958: Rove should lose clearance Email Print

So how about it Mr. "War Time President"? Mr. "Honor & Integrity"? It is quite clear that your "brain" violated, if not criminal law, then an Executive Order relating to disclosure of classified info. We have Chris Matthews and "Your wife is fair game". We have "Official A" and Novak. We have Matt Cooper. Rove told reporters Wilson's wife worked for the CIA, which, as Fitzgerald noted in his press conference and in Libby's indictment, that information was classified.... No need to wait for Fitzgerald to finish his business, Rove dunnit. .. at least as it pertains to actions that you Mr. President can take to restore the public trust and integrity to the national security of the United States. And you have the power, indeed the obligation, to hold him accountable as outlined in the EO.

Or do the rules only apply to people who don't work for you?

Atler at Newsweek:

According to last week's indictment of Scooter Libby, a person identified as "Official A" held conversations with reporters about Plame's identity as a an undercover CIA operative, information that was classified. News accounts subsequently confirmed that that official was Rove. Under Executive Order 12958, signed by President Clinton in 1995, such a disclosure is grounds for, at a minimum, losing access to classified information.

Section 5.1 of Clinton's executive order prohibits "any knowing, willful or negligent action that could reasonably be expected to result in an unauthorized disclosure of classified information." While the law against revealing the identity of a CIA operative requires that the perpetrator intentionally disclosed such classified information (a high standard, which may be one reason Fitzgerald did not indict on those grounds), the executive order covers "negligence," or unintentional disclosure.

That means the only proper answer to a reporter's questions about Joseph Wilson's wife would have been something along the lines of, "You know I cannot discuss who may or may not be in the CIA." The indictment makes clear that this was not the answer Official A provided when the subject was discussed with reporters Bob Novak and Matt Cooper.

The sanctions for such disclosure are contained in Section 5.7 of the executive order. That section says that "the agency head, senior agency official or other supervisory official shall, at a minimum, promptly remove the classification authority of any individual who demonstrates reckless disregard or a pattern of error in applying the classification standards of this order." Any reasonable reading of the events covered in the indictment would consider Rove's behavior "reckless." The fact that he discussed Plame's identity with reporters more than once constitutes a pattern.


KEYWORDS: , , ,

Sign up for a Complimentary Member Account... Join the community! It's fast. And it'll allow you to take advantage of all this site's great features!

< Sen. Roberts Is A Big Fat Liar | Jimmy Carter takes on the Christian Right [now with poll!] >
 Display:
You make a good point.

by D Cupples on 11/03/2005 05:38:40 PM EST

...claerance and all, he will be gone very soon. IMHO.

The Albany Project. The best damned blog about New York State politics.

by NYBri on 11/05/2005 01:13:42 PM EST

Is whistling for Rover to step down.  I've heard several Republican sources saying that the sooner he's gone, the better.

by Devilstower on 11/05/2005 03:48:09 PM EST

[ Parent ]
 Display: