Sponsors

Study: American Healthcare on Life Support Email Print

The Republican Party is killing us by peddling the "free market" as a cure-all.

A study by the journal Health Affairs demonstrates that America's addiction to the so-called "free market" brand of healthcare is a dependency that has sent the nation into a downward spiral:
Americans pay more when they get sick than people in other Western nations and get more confused, error-prone treatment, according to the largest survey to compare U.S. health care with other nations.

The survey of nearly 7,000 sick adults in the United States, Australia, Canada, New Zealand, Britain and Germany found Americans were the most likely to pay at least $1,000 in out-of-pocket expenses. More than half went without needed care because of cost and more than one-third endured mistakes and disorganized care when they did get treated.

Although patients in every nation sometimes run into obstacles to getting care and deficiencies when they do get treated, the United States stood out for having the highest error rates, most disorganized care and highest costs, the survey found.

The current system overburdens employers and employees alike and has a ripple effect on the economy that is begninning to rival that of high oil and gasoline prices.

Employers are seeing profits that could be used to expand the growth of their businesses sucked away. Employees are waiting too long to seek treatment, which results in their illness becoming more serious and more difficult and costly to treat, thus lowering their productivity.

The absence of a universal healthcare system in the U.S. has led to a growing crisis in this country, but the GOP is too busy doling out tax breaks and corporate welfare to  Big Pharma and the HMOs to actually address the problem.

But then, Republicans have repeatedly proven that they're great at causing problems but lousy at solving them; the party has no new ideas, and spends more time destroying than creating. Instead -- and as always -- it takes liberal creativity and ingenuity to build on what America has to offer, to present real programs for fixing what ails us.


KEYWORDS:

Sign up for a Complimentary Member Account... Join the community! It's fast. And it'll allow you to take advantage of all this site's great features!

< Strike 7 | Got a happy story XXVII? >
 Display:
I find it astounding how many times we get the "company X can't compete with imports because of rising health care costs" and never get the followthrough of "the health care costs of those imports are carried by the governments involved, so the companies don't have to shoulder them."

American companies really are operating at a huge disadvantage.  It amazes me that there's not a line of CEO's at Bush's door, demanding single-payed health care.  My guess is, if those CEOs were engaged in running their businesses rather than just milking them for another 30% raise, we'd get some action.

by Devilstower on 11/05/2005 03:35:15 PM EST

Too many companies are unwilling to dip into their profits to provide decent health benefits as a means of attracting and keeping employees; eventually -- probably when GM collapses -- several industries are going to gang-up on the healthcare field and demand government intervention.

Hopefuly, the excesses of Big Pharma and the HMOs have prepped Americans enough that they'll be so amenable to a universal, single payer plan that no amount of "Harry and Louise" commercials from the insurance industry will sucker them into changing their minds.

by S M Dixon on 11/05/2005 11:56:01 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Along these point already,  they started a couple of years ago.  They have been totally ignored by the repugs, even those from Michigan who get big fat checks from their PAC's

by btower on 11/06/2005 10:26:31 AM EST

[ Parent ]
...my next diary iddea. Thanks!

by S M Dixon on 11/05/2005 11:56:42 PM EST

 Display: