Sponsors

Iraq Folly Will Haunt Republicans For Decades Email Print

Tuesday's impressive wins by new governors Tim Kaine in Virginia and Jon Corzine in New Jersey will be attributed to many different factors.  Some will say that they ran good campaigns.  Others will suggest that Corzine scored points through some of his votes in the Senate, such as his vote against the bankruptcy bill.  And still others will make good observations that both of them are trustworthy, quality individuals who know how to address an audience.

I have a slightly simpler take on Tuesday's overwhelmingly positive results - and to understand it, we must start just over three years ago, when this election season really began.

Sept. 12, 2002: "Al Qaeda terrorists escaped from Afghanistan and are known to be in Iraq."

The next thing that happened in this year's campaign cycle was the following:

Jan 28, 2003: "Our intelligence sources tell us that he (Saddam) has attempted to purchase high-strength aluminum tubes suitable for nuclear weapons production."

A few months later came this one:

May 1, 2003: "The liberation of Iraq is a crucial advance in the campaign against terror.  We have removed an ally of Al Qaeda and cut off a source of terrorist funding."

Then there was the memorable 2004 revelation from Alberto Gonzales:

"In my judgment, this new paradigm renders obselete Geneva's strict limitations on questioning of enemy prisoners and renders quaint some of its provisions."

Now you might be rolling your eyes about now, thinking, "Hey, ColdFusion, that was years ago, and its long since forgotten."

Rather than respond to your comment myself, I'll opt to bring my new friend Trent Lott (R, Mississippi) to the podium:

Nov. 8, 2005: "We can not remain silent. We have met the enemy, and it is us [Republicans]."

Starting in the early morning of November 3, 2004, I was perplexed as to how such an obvious betrayal of the trust of the American people was rewarded with more Senate seats and a renewed White House.  I openly wondered whether my friends and neighbors were even paying attention.  OK, I'll admit it... I even wondered why they hated America.

On Tuesday, I think I finally got my answer.

They were paying attention after all... But, as usual, they were just a little bit slow.  They were trailing along as snail mail voters tend to do in a live blogging world.  Many of them like to follow the herd - make sure a few others are voting that way before they pile on.  And the declining approval of the President and the Congress have finally given them the mental "A-ok" thumbs up signal to jump off the runaway train.

So to the ones late to reality, I say "Welcome."  You have met the enemy, and the enemy was you.  Up was down and down was up - you were a proud part of the Alice in Wonderland presidency.

Just drink the bottle marked "Clue!" and watch in amazement while your brain expands back to normal size.

I still wish you had RSVPed and arrived here a year ago like I wrote on the invitation, but we're still happy to have you.  There will be cake and cookies in the Cortex foyer.

Congrats to our new governors and the many other Democrats at local levels who prevailed in Tuesday's elections!  But the real fun is coming in 2006, when the items listed above will carry us to a majority in the House and Senate, and back to the White House two years later.

It's becoming apparent that the real Neo-con legacy will be a revitalized Democratic America.  And that is something I can get excited about.


KEYWORDS: , , , ,

Sign up for a Complimentary Member Account... Join the community! It's fast. And it'll allow you to take advantage of all this site's great features!

< About that Intelligence Budget | Focus on Your Local Focus on the Family >
 Display:
but I actually have some sympathy for the "slow learners" here in America. I think there have been two factors at work.

  1. People are overwhelmed with personal economic problems, trying to make ends meet, feeling a personal time crunch as well. And it's difficult in today's political climate to get the truth, at least in small enough doses that it can fit into overstressed lives and make any sense. Most people understandably get their news from TV; after all, I think those of us who are political junkies, willing to wade through lots of written material and reports to get the truth are in a very small minority. To us, it's not only vital, it's fun, it's what we do for pleasure and fulfillment.

  2. I think it's really hard for Americans to even wrap their heads around the astounding fact that their president lied to them. And such bald-faced, intentional lies! There is a knee-jerk respect given to our leaders in this country (and in a healthy democracy, this is not such a bad thing). Most people assume their leaders will not lie to them, and that if they do, it's inadvertent. They trust that their president has the country's best interests at heart. While it's led to such debacles as we're seeing now, I don't think the alternative is appealing -- assuming of everyone elected, at all times, that their motives are nefarious. This is going to be a tough one to heal, this breach of trust, and I think Americans are going to be feeling the effects for decades.

by SusanG on 11/09/2005 10:42:20 AM EST

It may not sound like it in the above post, but I completely understand the realities of a busy life and the impact on ones ability to follow everything, all the time.  I have sympathy, which is why I've offered the "Clue!" syrum (and the cake and cookies).

And, as I talked about in my book, you are absolutely correct about faith/trust.  But the inherent trust only lasts until they've seen the approval rating plummet month after month after month.  Then the trust begins to slowly, subconciously deteriortate.

by ColdFusion04 on 11/09/2005 10:47:40 AM EST

[ Parent ]
 Display: