Sponsors

Are You a Dominionist? Take the Test! Email Print

You may not be a dominionist -- but you might be surprised to find out what you really are, according the folks at Worldview Weekend:

"After you've taken the test, you will get an instant score. Your worldview will be tested in the area of law, economics, civil government, religion, social issues, sociology (family issues) education and science. Your worldview will be rated for these eight areas as either: Strong Biblical Worldview Thinker, Moderate Biblical Worldview Thinker, Secular Humanist Worldview Thinker, Socialist Worldview Thinker or Communist/Marxist/Socialist /Secular Humanist Worldview Thinker. You will also receive an overall worldview score and rating..... For those of you scoring the highest score possible, Biblical Theism, you will be REWARDED with a beautiful, professional looking certificate. This certificate will certify that you took the test and scored as a Strong Biblical Worldview Thinker. You can print out your certificate at the end of the test, but it will also be emailed to you so you may save it or print it out on beautiful parchment paper. This certificate would look great on your wall and would also be very rewarding for students who take this test.

Worldview Weekend is an itinerant seminar -- roving the country teaching dominionist thinking. They have about 20 such events around the country each year, reaching, they claim, about 20,000 people.

I know about some, but certainly not all of the "faculty" who are teaching aspects of this "Biblical Worldview."

One of the regulars is David Barton, a propagandist for the notion that America was founded as a Christian nation -- that must be restored. He is also Vice-Chairman of the Texas Republican Party. Carlos wrote a bit about Barton at Talk to Action the other day. Barton is so popular that Worldview Weekend has a special section of their online bookstore devoted to Barton.

Another WW regular is Christian Reconstructionist Gary DeMar, who is featured in journalist John Sugg's article on Christian Reconstructionism in the current issue of Mother Jones magazine. Sugg stopped by Talk to Action for a chat on Tuesday. DeMar is also an advocate of the idea that America was founded as a Christian nation and that it must be restored. But what I his vision of the once and future Christian America?

I wrote a great deal about DeMar in Eternal Hostility:  The Struggle Between Theocracy and Democracy. Here is a brief section to give you a flavor of DeMar's role. In 1994, the commissioners in Cobb County, Georgia, passed a series of resolutions against homosexuality, defunded country arts programs and made it illegal for county funds to be spent on abortions. The point man in the effort, Gordon Wysong was honored at a banquet sponsored by Gary DeMar's activist think tank American Vision.

"In his banquet speech, commissioner Wysong blasted homosexuality, exclaiming, "We should blame them for every social failure in America." He received a standing ovation. American Vision president Gary DeMar called him a "statesman."

The keynote speaker was [American Vision] boardmember Dr. Steven Hotze, who has written that "to solve our nation's social and moral problems, our government must enforce biblical law. Hotze was, at the time, chairman of the Harris County (Houston) GOP, and remains prominent in Texas Republican politics.

In his speech, he called for destablization of the federal government.  "What we need in America today," Hotze declared, "is judges, we need mayors, we need governors who are willing to stand up to our Supreme Court, to our president and [apparently referring to abortion] say 'Not in our city.' Hotze continued, "I am convinced if men of courage in positions of leadership.... would stand, they would bring about a significant constitutional crisis." Hotze concluded, in the presence of a number of candidates for state, local and federal office, "We need to get men elected to do that."

Quite independently, former Southern Baptist Bruce Prescott, then of Houston, was also learning about Hotze. He discussed this history in his first post at Talk to Action last week.

There are now many folks who are busy comparing notes about what's been going on for the past few decades.  It's long over due, don't you think?  

Meanwhile, it is unlikely that such political histrionics as Hotze's will be on display at a Worldview Weekend. But given who some of the speakers are, it is fair to raise the question that if a Christian nation is the goal, what would it look like? If a dominionist political movement in the GOP or in the rival Constitution Party (the third largest party in the U.S.) is underway, then what is the agenda? Is Gary DeMar's idea of statesmanship where this movement is headed?  Is a Worldview Weekend seminar coming to your town?


KEYWORDS: , ,

Sign up for a Complimentary Member Account... Join the community! It's fast. And it'll allow you to take advantage of all this site's great features!

< The Sleeping Giant Waketh: AP Takes Down Bush Speech | 10 Marines Killed, 11 Wounded Near Falluja >
 Display:
In every question that asked about my belief in God, I "strongly agreed," including agreeing with the literal resurection of Christ, God's creation of the universe, etc.

I still came out as a "secular humanist."  Why?  Because I opposed capital punishment and war, thought there should be regulations over education, and said that God used evolution as his tool.  Oh, but I did get 2 points for saying the George Bush was the president.

So, evidently, your a secular humanist if you believe in God, believe in Christ, believe in the afterlife, believe in the bible, but don't believe it's okay to slaughter people.

by Devilstower on 12/01/2005 04:44:12 PM EST

a Communist-Marxist-Socialis t-Secular Humanist Worldview Thinker.

There are 170 possible points.  My only plus points came in for strongly agreeing that GWB is Prez of the US.

These are the results for my age group???

    Strong Biblical Worldview Thinker
    74.1%

    Moderate Biblical Worldview Thinker
    16.6%

    Secular Humanist Worldview Thinker
    3.8%

    Socialist Worldview Thinker
    2.8%

    Communist/Marxist/Socialist /Secular Humanist Worldview Thinker
    2.8%

Huh.  Who knew?

All it takes to fly is to hurl yourself at the ground... and miss. (Douglas Adams)

by scoophound on 12/01/2005 06:03:02 PM EST

I'm a Communist-Marxist-Socialist -Secular Humanist Worldview Thinker too!

Taking the test as an agnostic was a little strange. After a while I thought I ought to change my screen name to "No Opinion."

That WAS a strange test. A mix of purely "factual" (absolutely testable) questions (is "separation of church and state" in the Constitution) with things that I would consider a matter of belief or faith ("God is the Creator of the Universe").

I was interested to see that I lost two points for having "no opinion" on:

"George W. Bush is the President of the United States of America."

Hey! I want answers for Ohio in 04 and Florida in 00 before I answer that one.

by astraea on 12/01/2005 07:48:58 PM EST

[ Parent ]
But then I saw your -74 but I am still your run of the mill Communist-Marxist-Socialist -Secular Humanist Worldview Thinker.

I printed out my results so I can review the areas where my answers were "wrong".  To me, having faith that something is true does not make it factual, which probably goes a long way in explaining my score.

by dansk47 on 12/02/2005 05:36:18 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Which made me a "socialist worldview thinker"

The test is interesting in part, because it is a marketing mechanism for various sponsoring "ministries." Among other things, they suggested I attend Summit Ministries seminars to improve my score.

by Frederick Clarkson on 12/02/2005 08:24:28 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Talk to Action site for obvious reasons.

All it takes to fly is to hurl yourself at the ground... and miss. (Douglas Adams)

by scoophound on 12/03/2005 10:48:30 AM EST

[ Parent ]
Gee Scoophound, I took the test and I only got a -54 for the answers.  Does that make me further right or left, according to the Worldview geopolitical / religious spectrum?

I guess I won't be getting my framed certificate of achievement.

Looking at these "correct" answers, Worldview wanted you to respond with either "strongly agree" or "strongly disagree" to these questions.  I don't buy the strongly agreeing or disagreeing to these issues.  These questions are very subjective, and yet the Worldview test required absoloute answers.  Take for example the question, "Under some circumstances Christians are called to disobey the laws of government."  The Worldview "correct" answer was to strongly agree.  I, however, answered "tend to agree."  There are instances in our history where civil disobediance is necessary towards changing unjust laws--look at the examples of the civil rights movement in the 1960s for changing the Jim Crow laws of segregation.  But I would not accept the idea that it is right for some Christian wingnuts to be assasinating doctors who performed abortions, because these "Christians" are called to civil disobediance, so they can change the government's laws to reflect their own "higher laws" of God.  So this survey was pretty skewered.

by eahopp on 12/02/2005 10:17:00 PM EST

[ Parent ]
being the only person where they might approve of my "right to die".

The thing is, on most of those God is the creator, type of questions, I had "no opinion"  (OK, I "strongly disagreed" with the Satan thing) and I also "tended to agree" on the civil disobedience part for the same reasons as Eahopp. Plus, I put aside all sarcasm on the GWB is Pres issue, which took some effort on my part, although I admire Astraea's fairness in wanting answers.

So why am I so LEFT that I can feel the Pacific Ocean on my toes, all the way from Atlanta?

Left and proud of it.
Carole

All it takes to fly is to hurl yourself at the ground... and miss. (Douglas Adams)

by scoophound on 12/03/2005 10:43:54 AM EST

[ Parent ]
I found it very interesting that in questions where I "strongly disagreed" to a statement, but the "correct" answer was "strongly agree," I lost one point.

But when I had "no opinion" I lost two points.

So are they saying it is better to be flat-out "wrong"?

Why do you lose more points for withholding judgment or being undecided?

Do they think you are more likely to come over to their view if they can show you that you are wrong, but if you are staunchly undecided, you'll be harder to convert?

by astraea on 12/02/2005 07:21:29 PM EST

I tried taking this test a second time, only this time I answered the questions the way that I thought a right-wing Christian funamentalist would answer them.  I got a score of 122 out of 170, or a 71%.  I guess I moved up from a Communist/Marxist/Socialist /Secular Humanist Worldview Thinker (of which I answered the questions as per my views), to a Moderate Biblical Worldview Thinker (Of what I thought the answers would be).

Oh, and I didn't even study for the test!  

by eahopp on 12/02/2005 10:39:24 PM EST

You improved your score that much -- and you didn't even take one of their expensive seminars!

Scary to think what would happen if you did!

by Frederick Clarkson on 12/02/2005 11:39:40 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Socialist Worldview Thinker, and I couldn't be more proud. You know, I had to choose no opinion quite a number of times because they framed the question in a BS way (the right to end life question at the end). These people are scary. I wish they would actually read the part of the Bible with Jesus in it.

If you don't understand someone, consider that the shortcoming may not lie with that person, but rather with your own understanding.

by Aethern on 12/03/2005 09:24:06 AM EST

 Display: