Sponsors

Premature evacuation? Email Print

"Our troops have become the primary target of the insurgency... [Islamic insurgents]are united against U.S. forces, and we have become a catalyst for violence...It's time to bring [our troops]home..." -- Rep. John Murtha, (D-Pa.)

Is it really? I certainly wish it was. I very much want it to be. But is it time for the troops to come home? After thoroughly ****ing up Iraq, injecting ourselves into a country which arguably (but most likely) wants nothing more than to be left free of Western influences and meddling, and then squatting down in their country for what appears to be "the long haul," is it time to leave?

Out of every political writer / poster / blogger in the world and possibly the universe, I am probably the worst at research. My former papers for school usually were written without the aid of sources and then I'd just plug in the minimum required number to secure my "A". Please keep that in mind. I write this not to incite anger, nor to start an argument or to call anyone's political beliefs to question, but as a very serious issue that I'd like answered or at least commented on by the people on this and other sites, especially those who have more expertise in this sort of thing than I do (which is basically all of you).

Here's what I'm asking.

There seems to be three political camps right now as far as troop withdrawal is concerned: (1) bring them home now, (2) bring them home gradually, (3) bring them home eventually but we don't want to say when. It seems to me that the most passionate of bloggers fall within the first category, arguing for immediate withdrawal. I know John Murtha also believes we should immediately withdraw.

I believe Hillary Clinton favors a more gradual withdrawal based upon the success of the Iraqi elections.

We all know who likes the final option.

So, here is the question: Where do all of you stand on this issue?

I see merits to all of the plans as well as flaws to the plans. Personally, I'm in agreement with Hillary (to my everlasting dismay). I see nothing but problems for the Iraqis if we just up and leave (Vietnam, anyone?), and I see even more problems if we just stay for an indeterminable amount of time (...Vietnam, anyone?)

More training to the Iraqi troops, more supplies and rebuilding efforts to Iraq itself, and a tentative timeline for withdrawal would, in my non-politically-intelligent opinion, go a longer way to regaining worldwide respect and trust, stabilizing Iraq after we ****ed it up, and most importantly, reassuring the public and bolstering troop morale.

But like I said, I've done no research; I have no facts or hard numbers; I've just got what I've heard and what I think.

So, what does everyone else think?


KEYWORDS: , ,

Sign up for a Complimentary Member Account... Join the community! It's fast. And it'll allow you to take advantage of all this site's great features!

Poll

Withdrawing the troops:
Bring every one of them home as quickly as possible, regardless of the Iraqi election 66%
See how the Iraqi election goes, then make a plan to bring them home quick as possible 0%
See how the Iraqi election goes, then begin a slow withdrawal 33%
Begin a slow withdrawal now, regardless of the Iraqi election 0%
Leave them there for now, bring them home in time for U. S. elections 0%

Votes: 3
Results | Other Polls
< Deja vu: Democrats Can't "Do Better" | Getting out the "news" in Iraq - the 4th PO Group >
 Display:
In this Daily Kos article I argue that the best solution for everyone is the simplest and most democratic: put it to a binding referendum of Iraqis.

by peeder on 12/11/2005 09:23:44 AM EST

 Display: