Sponsors

We don't need no steeeenking civil liberties... Email Print

this friggin' bunch is totally out of control... 'course, that's hardly news, now is it...?
   Months after the Sept. 11 attacks, President Bush secretly authorized the National Security Agency to eavesdrop on Americans and others inside the United States to search for evidence of terrorist activity without the court-approved warrants ordinarily required for domestic spying, according to government officials.

(continued)

   Under a presidential order signed in 2002, the intelligence agency has monitored the international telephone calls and international e-mail messages of hundreds, perhaps thousands, of people inside the United States without warrants over the past three years in an effort to track possible "dirty numbers" linked to Al Qaeda, the officials said. The agency, they said, still seeks warrants to monitor entirely domestic communications.

    The previously undisclosed decision to permit some eavesdropping inside the country without court approval represents a major shift in American intelligence-gathering practices, particularly for the National Security Agency, whose mission is to spy on communications abroad. As a result, some officials familiar with the continuing operation have questioned whether the surveillance has stretched, if not crossed, constitutional limits on legal searches.


the bill of rights and the u.s. constitution are merely annoying inconveniences to the bushco crowd of criminals...

but hang on... it just gets worse and worse...


    On the second page of a report which reveals the White House engaged in warantless domestic spying, the New York Times reveals that it held the story for a full year at the request of the Bush Administration, RAW STORY can reveal.

    The Times also reveals that senior members of Congress from both parties knew about Bush's decision to spy on Americans who were making international calls or emails, without warrants.

    Further, the Times notes that they have omitted information in the article they did write, agreeing with the Bush Administration that the information could be useful for terrorists.

but, WAIT, there's MORE...

the story now has legs... long ones...

(from wapo...)


    Kate Martin, director of the Center for National Security Studies at George Washington University, said the secret order may amount to the president authorizing criminal activity.

    The law governing clandestine surveillance in the United States, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, prohibits conducting electronic surveillance not authorized by statute. A government agent can try to avoid prosecution if he can show he was "engaged in the course of his official duties and the electronic surveillance was authorized by and conducted pursuant to a search warrant or court order of a court of competent jurisdiction," according to the law.

    "This is as shocking a revelation as we have ever seen from the Bush administration," said Martin, who has been sharply critical of the administration's surveillance and detention policies. "It is, I believe, the first time a president has authorized government agencies to violate a specific criminal prohibition and eavesdrop on Americans."


oooo... the shit is hitting the fan...

http://takeitpersonally.blo gspot.com/


KEYWORDS: , , , ,

Sign up for a Complimentary Member Account... Join the community! It's fast. And it'll allow you to take advantage of all this site's great features!

< Narnia vs. Brokeback Mountain | Harm On The Range >
 Display:
have never had to show accountability for their actions. So details like the constitution being a 'piece of paper' or the bill of rights probably seem quaint to them.

Add it to their utter contempt for anything but money and power----I doubt that little details like following the law and respecting our rights even crosses their minds. Until they need to take a public stand.

If you are going to skate on thin ice, you might as well dance.

by zesty grapher on 12/21/2005 08:48:36 AM EST

 Display: