Sponsors

The GOP's (Howard) Dean Derangement Syndrome Email Print

Here's a question: Why does the GOP care so much about Howard Dean? I'm not being sarcastic - I'm really asking. Tonight they pounced on Dean for an interview he gave to a radio station in San Antonio. Dean compared the war in Iraq to Vietnam and said the "idea that we're going to win the war in Iraq is an idea which is just plain wrong." Cue Ken Mehlman:
In predicting that America will lose the war in Iraq, Howard Dean is the latest national Democrat leader to embrace retreat and defeat in the central front in the War on Terror.  His outrageous prediction sends the wrong message to our troops, the enemy, and the Iraqi people just 10 days before historic elections.  Democrats across the nation should stand up and reject the pessimism of their chairman and strategy of defeat by their Congressional leaders.
Let's look at this.

For starters, is it clear that Dean is advocating retreat-and-defeat? (I like condensing Mehlmanisms into hyphenated phrases.) Not even George Bush goes around the country saying our troops are going to win the war in Iraq. Yes, he talks about "total victory" and all that nice stuff, but how are we going to achieve victory? "As Iraqis stand up, we will stand down." We're not going to win anything - the Iraqis are going to win. In a followup AP story, this is a little clearer: "I wish the president had paid more attention to the history of Iraq before we had gotten in there. The idea that we're going to win this war is just plain wrong."

But we're applying logic to a press release, which is nuts. The GOP doesn't approach its PR by logically debating Democratic arguments. It does PR, for the most part, by bashing Howard Dean. A search of gop.com reveals 67 press releases about or attacking Howard Dean - 53 of them since he was elected DNC chairman on February 12, 2005. In that period they've attacked House Dem Leader Nanci Pelosi 35 times and Hillary Clinton only 20 times. (Harry Reid has appeared in 76 attacks, mostly because of his role in the filibuster and judicial battles.)

Is it ordinary for a political party to attack the other party's chairman like this? In a word, no. When you consider that the RNC's anti-Dean attacks are echoed and hyped by Fox News, Drudge, and any number of pro-GOP bloggers, Dean has quickly become the most-attacked party chairman in history.

Which presents a question: Why are they going after Dean? The anti-Dean campaign hasn't damaged the Democrats at all.

Here's the best example. As Kos noted in a late November post, the Virginia Republican Party made many attempts to link Dem Gov. candidate Tim Kaine to Dean. Going off the fact that Dean's DNCs was giving $5 million to Kaine's campaign, the VAGOP angrily denounced "Tim Kaine's extreme political makeover that is being underwritten by Howard Dean and his liberal special interests." Virginia conservatives and swing voters were made aware that Howard Dean was supporting Tim Kaine. Then they elected him by 6 points over Republican Jerry Kilgore.

The Democrats won most every other election across America last month (with the notable exceptions of Ohio's ballot referenda and the NYC mayor's office), and most of the wins - New Jersey, California, New York - were in states where the GOP probably doesn't press the Dean issue. But that Virginia election is worth writing large. Conservative Virginia was one of the states that, in the 1990s, flipped from conservative Democratic control to right-wing Republican control under the leadership of George Allen and Jim Gilmore, in no small part because they tied Democrats to Bill Clinton.

And there's the crux of the issue - the GOP isn't getting anywhere with its Dean-bashing because Howard Dean is DNC chairman, not president, and voters don't care who the party chairmen are. Like so many Republican fumbles of late - Social Security, Harriet Miers - the insistence on Dean-bashing is a result of the party's beltway mentality. They've grown very used to the DC media, where things like party chairmen's gaffes or Meet the Press appearences are incredibly important and define coverage for weeks.

This tendency is aggravated by Howard Dean himself - in short, Republicans loathe him. In 2003, they  began attacking Dean early on as he gathered momentum as a presidential candidate. They hated the way he attacked Bush, but they were gleeful at the idea of running against a liberal from Vermont who had signed a civil unions bill. You only need to look at the difference between GOP fortunes in 2004 and 2005 to understand this - the modern GOP only prospers when it's running against somebody. When they had Kerry to bash, they rode high. They did very well running against Tom Daschle in 2002. Now, they see Dean as the closest thing to a national "opponent." So they oppose him.

I reckon many of you grimace when you see Drudge or your local right-wing talker pumping the new Dean "gaffe" and bashing him til their knuckles bleed. Maybe a different facial expression is called for.


KEYWORDS: ,

Sign up for a Complimentary Member Account... Join the community! It's fast. And it'll allow you to take advantage of all this site's great features!

< Murtha "Likes" Hadley: Sees US Troops Out of Iraq by Year End 2006 | Dawn of the Dummies: Brains! Brraaaiinnns! >
 Display:
It's wonderful to see Republicans bashing away at a non-issue, doesn't it? Keeps them busy doing what they do best...ummmm....uhhhh....oh  never mind. Anyway, with them focused on Dean, they aren't protecting their...flank. That would be DeLay, Frist, Blount, Rove, Libby, et.al. So, for my money I'd rather they just keep focused on Dean until '08.

Common Sense is not Common

by RustyBrown on 12/05/2005 09:13:59 PM EST

Let them carry on all they want. I don't think any sane people take Mehlman seriously anymore.  (Not that we ever did.)

But as long as we're on the subject of their pettiness, I'd like to see the media and all of us continue to correct their insistent error of referring to members of the other national political party as "Democrat" leaders.

Keith Olberman, at least, has pointed to this perversity before, but why others don't is beyond me.  It's clearly an attempt to prevent the opposition party from being considered "democratic" in any sense.  If we followed their "rules" of grammar and usage, we'd have to refer to them as Republicks.

Go figure. Nothing is too low for some of these types.

End of rant.~

:}

Taxes shall be levied according to ability to pay. That is the only American principle. FDR

by btyarbro on 12/05/2005 09:58:49 PM EST

免费电 4433;下载 免费在 2447;电影 看免费 0005;影 免费电 4433;网站 韩国电 4433; 两性生 7963; 性教育 9255; 电影神 5805; 电影雏 3738; 免费激 4773;电影 免费黄 3394;电影 最新电 4433; 成人性 9233;电影 免费小 0005;影 性电影 9979;载 成人电 4433;下载 免费电 4433;在线ෆ 6;看 宽带电 4433; 经典电 4433; 恐怖电 4433; 免费影 9255; 免费影 8498; 最新大 9255; 十八电 4433;网 美女写 0495; 人体艺 6415; 美女图 9255; 美女走 0809; 美腿图 9255; 三级片 强奸电 4433; 美女祼 0307;图片 黄色电 4433;下载 免费色 4773;电影 性感美 2899;图片 漂亮妹 2969;图片 做爱图 9255; 美少女 2270;片 日本av电& #24433; 情色电 4433; 同志电 4433;下载 激情视 9057;下载 明星露 8857;图片 写真电 4433; 阴部图 9255; 乳房图 9255; 明星裸 9031; 性爱视 9057; 偷拍图 9255; 美眉图 9255; 泳装美 2899; 美女内 4915;内裤 性爱贴 2270; 情趣内 4915;图片 性生活 2270;片 作爱图 9255; 艳情小 5828; 性交姿 1183; 性息港 做爱电 4433; 性福联 0431; 人体摄 4433; 明星裸 9031; 裸女图 9255; 黄色小 5828; 成人小 5828; 乱伦小 5828; 强暴电 4433; 轮奸视 9057; 性虐待 0005;影 迷奸图 9255; 妓女日 5760; 汤加丽 0889;真集 全裸美 2899; 淫荡小 5828; 淫乱小 5828; 淫书金 9942;梅 舒淇写 0495; 美女脱 4915;图片 裸体女 0154;图片 女性人 0307;摄影 女性手 8139;图片 波霸美 2899; 淫水美 2899;鲍鱼 阴户阴 6947;臀部༅ 2;毛
美女图 4211; 口交肛 0132;图片 手机铃 2768; 和弦铃 2768;下载 手机图 9255;下载 手机图 9255; 特效铃 2768;下载 手机彩 0449;下载  诺基亚 8083;声下๙ 3;

by on 05/19/2006 06:35:32 AM EST

[ Parent ]
Similar to what Jimmy Carter said last night on the Daily Show.  Why do the Republicans demonize Carter and Dean?  Because they tell the truth.

Democrats who dare speak the truth have to be ostracized immediately, lest their tendencies spread.  Only when you're sure that truth-telling has been properly proscribed can you relax.

by Devilstower on 12/06/2005 08:42:26 AM EST

Wish I had more to add, but you put it so well. They are the unquashable voices of truth. Of course they frighten the wingnuts.

Political Cortex -- Brain Food for the Body Politic

by Tom Ball on 12/06/2005 10:07:22 AM EST

[ Parent ]
This is all about painting every Democrat as a "Michael Moore liberal," since Republicans have been trained to salivate at the sound of those words.

And Dean is our token liberal, even though he's really a moderate who opposed the Iraq war. And if you watch any talk show (e.g., Duncan Hunter on Hardball last night) they use the word liberal when talking about Democrats. Look at how they pounced on Murtha with the "Michael Moore" moniker.

All this Dean bashing is just fodder for the base. You know, the purple band-aid crowd who rec'v Mehlman's email.

It's weak, but it's all they've got.

Dissent Protects Democracy

by cscs on 12/06/2005 10:03:51 AM EST

two thumbs up!!!Oh, there is such a thing ! It is really too interesting. Heartily! I come to USA, welcome to come to USA to play, I will become your guide then Marble fireplace Marble columns Marble fountain Marble sculpture Marble sculpture Stone flowerpotCarved fireplace Marble bench Stone bathtub china paper box paper box made in china china paper bag iron oxide iron oxide antistatic rubber hose frp pipe,FRP RO Pressure Vessels magnesium oxide board PULTRUDED PROFILES sodium percarbonate Flex banner Industrial polyester yarn bamboo veneer bamboo veneer 云南旅 8216; 云南旅 8216; 云南旅 4892;社 云南旅 8216; 云南行 1038; 云南旅 8216; 投资 创业 翻译公 1496;,翻译公 1496;,翻译 0844;司 北京汽 6710;租赁 北京租 6710;租车ࠤ 4;司灯具 塑料模 0855; 酒店管 9702;系统ཎ 4;饮管理& #31995;统颜料颜料杭州网 2476;公司 google左侧þ 90;名 google左侧þ 90;名 google左侧þ 90;名 google排名 google排名 google排名 google优化þ 90;名 google推广 google左侧þ 90;名 google左侧þ 90;名google左侧þ 90;名google左侧þ 90;名google左侧þ 90;名google左侧þ 90;名google左侧þ 90;名google左侧þ 90;名 google左侧þ 90;名google左侧þ 90;名google左侧þ 90;名google排名google左侧þ 90;名google左侧þ 90;名google左侧þ 90;名google左侧þ 90;名google左侧þ 90;名google左侧þ 90;名google左侧þ 90;名google左侧þ 90;名google左侧þ 90;名google左侧þ 90;名google左侧þ 90;名google左侧þ 90;名google排名google排名google排名google排名 google排名 google左侧þ 90;名 google排名

by hxmnb on 01/15/2006 07:34:29 AM EST

 Display: