Sponsors

IRS Tracked Taxpayers' Political Info: Are Punitive Audits in our Future? Email Print

First, we learn that exec-branch staffers outed a CIA agent to punish her husband for criticizing President Bush.  Next, we learn that an exec-branch agency has been illegally spying on Americans with Bush's blessings.  

What's next, punitive IRS audits for Bush-critics?

It's not beyond possibility, given that a private contractor hired by the IRS to find deadbeat taxpayers collected voter information (including party affiliation) and gave it to the IRS:

Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., a member of an appropriations subcommittee with jurisdiction over the IRS, said the practice was an "outrageous violation of the public trust" that could undermine the agency's credibility.

IRS officials acknowledged that party affiliation information was routinely collected by a vendor for several months. They told the vendor last month to screen the information out.

Oddly, the contractor was not named in news articles.  

Murray's office found 20 states in which the IRS (or its contractor) had collected party affiliation info: Alaska, Arkansas, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Michigan, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Texas, Utah and Wisconsin.

Voter-registration data is public info in many states, but why would the IRS want it?

Maybe, the contractor wanted the info for its own purposes and inadvertently passed it along to the IRS.  In that case, tax dollars paid that contractor to do its other business---which may amount to contractor fraud.

This situation came to light after Colleen Kelley, president of the National Treasury Employees Union, told IRS officials about it last month.  IRS Deputy Commissioner John Dalrymple wrote the following to Kelley:

"the IRS makes no use of any information related to political party affiliation because IRS rules prohibit such usage," he wrote. "The only portion of voter registration information that is used relates to the voter's address."

Officials should answer several questions, before speculations run wilder:  

  1.   Who was the contractor?

  2.  Why did the contractor collect such info?

  3.  Why did the contractor send that info to the IRS?

  4.  How long has this been going on?

KEYWORDS: , , , , , , ,

Sign up for a Complimentary Member Account... Join the community! It's fast. And it'll allow you to take advantage of all this site's great features!

< DeLay QUITS! | Show Joementum the door: shop at the Weicker 2006 store! >
 Display:

As a benefactor of the taxpayer tracking in Ohio, the news article is a bit late. I had a number of articles on depleted uranium and ceramic uranium oxide gas published prior to the 2004 election. Shortly after the first four went out, I had two federal tax liens and a state tax lien and hefty fines on recalculated returns going back seven years. Even with the recalculated amounts, I was too far down the food chain to be drawing that type of attention. I became more important than the guy who owed millions. When I started my political activism  for veterans' rights, I knew the administration would try to silence me. They have 11,000 skeletons in the closet from the first Gulf War. I unloaded all I owned, joined the undergound economy, and don't use credit. Spy away!    

Live simply, that others may simply live.

by anton weiss on 01/08/2006 10:07:37 PM EST

Wow, could it be that certain segment of the political demographic has been found to be more prone to cheat on their taxes. Could this information increase the efficiency at which the IRS garners legitimate revenues from a certain segment of society. Not naming any names, but this still doesn't justify the reprhensible behavior.

by B Wade on 01/07/2006 08:36:01 PM EST

crappy news as tax time approaches.

Heh!

Oy!

Political Cortex -- Brain Food for the Body Politic

by Tom Ball on 01/09/2006 08:43:50 PM EST

 Display: