Sponsors

Pound them, boys. Pound them. Email Print

This October, rather than looking to the unifying words of FDR, or the clarion call of JFK, or even the no nonsense toughness of Harry Truman, it's time for Democrats to seek inspiration from another source.  It's time for us to turn to Jackson.

I don't mean Andrew.  I mean Stonewall.

"There are two things never to be lost sight of by a military commander. Always mystify, mislead, and surprise the enemy, if possible; and when you strike and overcome him, never give up the pursuit as long as your men have strength to follow; for an army routed, if hotly pursued, becomes panic-stricken, and can then be destroyed by half their number. The other rule is, never fight against heavy odds, if by any possible maneuvering you can hurl your own force on only a part, and that the weakest part, of your enemy and crush it. Such tactics will win every time, and a small army may thus destroy a large one in detail, and repeated victory will make it invincible." -- Stonewall Jackson

I recently wrote a diary on Lincoln's Lyceum Address, which I regard as one of the greatest speeches in American history, and an astounding début for a young man just moved to "civilization" from the frontier.   That speech includes the stirring pronouncement of American security.  
All the armies of Europe, Asia and Africa combined, with all the treasure of the earth their military chest; with a Bonaparte for a commander, could not by force, take a drink from the Ohio, or make a track on the Blue Ridge, in a trial of a thousand years... If destruction be our lot, we must ourselves be its author and finisher. As a nation of freemen, we must live through all time, or die by suicide.  
Lincoln's is only one example of a speech intended to unite, lift, and propel an audience toward action.  That action can be political, social or military, and the speakers as diverse as William Jennings Bryan, Winston Churchill, or Robert Kennedy.  Real life conflicts don't leave all that many opportunities for those eve of battle rallying cries, but fiction, has given us a thousand stirring moments from Antony telling his men to "cry havoc" and Henry's stirring evocation of "we band of brothers" up to Aragorn telling his troops that they may one day from a fight, but "not this day."

In his top-rated diary, New Deal Democrat called for a modern evocation of this sort, a rallying cry which can lift the country out of confusion and make clear the stakes of this current contest.  It's an excellent idea.  A necessary idea.  It's an idea for which I personally will put up $1000.  Here it is, Dr. Dean. Come and get it.

But while I'd love to hear such a inspiring call, and have on occasion tried, and failed, to craft something that brought forward those same emotions, that's not the purpose of this diary.  Instead, I want to bring you a simpler message.  A message loaded with less noble sentiments, even though I believe it is for noble purpose.  While I hope our party's leaders do create that single ad that becomes a nationwide clarifying moment, we troops in the field are called to another duty.

Through too many elections seasons, we've played defense.  We've shivered through September and October, looking at unfriendly polls and hoping for a last minute reprieve.  We've sweated at the surprises and plain old dirty tricks tossed our way by Republican operatives.  That's not this year.  This year, we're on offense.

Right now, Republicans are in the uncomfortable positions of people who are so used to winning, they don't know how to respond to failure.  At the opening of the American Civil War, the weaponry had advanced but the tactics were still the same as they had been for almost a century.  The result was casualties that were astoundingly high.  The Republicans are in the same position this year.  They're still pitching the same brand of fear and confusion that has seen them through since 1980, but the public is no longer buying.

The opportunity here isn't for a narrow victory.  It's for a slaughter.  

In the words of a thousand war-weary artillery commanders on a thousand smoky battlefields, we have to pound them.  We must harry them at every step.  Worry them on every front.  We can't let them recover.  We can't give them space.  We can't let them breathe.  

We have the reputation, and I think justifiably, of being the kinder of the two parties.  We don't have the vindictiveness and callous self-assurance of the right.    We find it more difficult to look on our fellow Americans as traitors and tend to see them as misguided souls who can yet be convinced of their error.

But for the next three weeks, we need to think of the words of Stonewall Jackson.  We need to hurl all our force on the weakest part of the Republican lie.  We need to attack them on Foley, expose the lies on Iraq, rip off the curtain covering the myth of Republican economic theory, hit them on every front, and when they think they know where we're going to hit next, come in and hit them from a whole new direction.

The Republicans are fond of declaring war on everything from drugs to terror, but from now until November 7, we have to consider ourselves at war with the forces that want to erode our rights, enrich the already rich at the cost of everyone else, and sponsor lies, torture, and fear.  We need to turn back to Shakespeare's Henry V for more good advice.

In peace there's nothing so becomes a man
As modest stillness and humility:
But when the blast of war blows in our ears,
Then imitate the action of the tiger;
Stiffen the sinews, summon up the blood,
Disguise fair nature with hard-favour'd rage.
That blast is blowing now.

KEYWORDS: ,

Sign up for a Complimentary Member Account... Join the community! It's fast. And it'll allow you to take advantage of all this site's great features!

< This Week in Blogging the Religious Right -- Framing Edition | Deval Patrick Rocks Boston Common >
 Display:
Lest we forget, the Evangelical Right -- and that's who we're talking about here -- hold more than the alleged "moral high ground" this country is famously hypocritical for.  They hold service in perpetuity on the court of media entertainment. Anybody stupid enough to publish discourses of, within, or merely about honest Christian dissent within the ranks of its right-wing  -- and that'll be the last time (s)he'll be seen on the air, in print, or endorsing products. Moreover, Evangelicals might just leave him or her with a surplus of sphincter muscle by the side of some road.

Imagine Lou Dobbs or even Keith Olbermann coming out and saying:

"I wonder how sincere certain forms of Christianity are that find an entire culture to be immoral while looking the other way over the plight of the least well-off among us.  Gee...maybe we ought to look into that.  Even the genuine believers among them continue to boil politics down all too often to various moral [read:"single-issue"]candidacies that offer the outraageous premise of making their tenets the law of the land."

"Oh...and by the way...did I leave out the part about my conversion to Islam?  Maybe I should be more open about that since its an entirely private matter."

Yeah, that'll happen.  Lou or Keith or whoever might as well say on the air where they park their cars and how to wire the ignition with C-4.

The Evangelical Right has been doing more than their homework the last three decades.  Their huge, vertically-integrated empires are there to stifle the opposition.  Meanwhile, smallish blogs on the 'Net cry out for religious tolerance in a virtual wilderness where the message might as well be spread door-to-door.  Such is the tight control of the MSM.  Corporate America loves the Christian Right.  I mean as long as Evangelicals polits aren't organizing some outrageous boycott against their advertisers.  But that battle ended long ago.  

Meanwhile, wealthy investors in media empires get free rein to support faith-based initiatives that promise to end social welfare as we know it. Grover Norquist might even get his wish after all: government small enough to drown in a bath tub.  The only difference'll be that he'll get to wear a clerical collar to the event.

Stonewall Jackson was never in a battle this easy.  His troops would be the only ones there. I.E., it would have looked like the "blue-bellies" went to bivouac in Canada.

by FlyCatcher on 10/15/2006 05:24:32 PM EST

 Display: