Sponsors

We Needed Apollo, We Got a Bottle Rocket Email Print

There are three kinds of State of the Union address.  

First come the kind of stirring speeches made by Franklin Roosevelt, by John Kennedy, and even by Lyndon Johnson -- the speeches that call us to great purpose.  These speeches take a chance, they go out on a political limb to offer America a change in direction.  They force both the president giving the speech and the public listening to stretch.

Next come the laundry list speeches.  These can often contain significant programs, but they lack any clear sense of direction, and often end up containing so many scattered ideas that it's hard to tell what the president really values.  Bill Clinton, take a bow.

Then come the speeches that tell us absolutely nothing.  No significant information.   No new ideas.  No guts.  No... anything.  That's what we got last night.

Let's go through the speech, shall we?  Let's see.  Intro, intro.  Mention of Correta Scott King.  Intro.  Intro.  Rambling.  More rambling.  Freedom is on the march.  Pabulum.  Hot air.  Nada.  Nada.  Wave to the guests.  Pabulum.  We're thirty minutes in, and not one single program, plan, or idea has even been brought up.  

Wait, here comes Africa, surely there will be some concrete suggestion to actually meet all the promises Bush has made but not fulfilled.

I urge Members of Congress to serve the interests of America by showing the compassion of America.
You... urge the members of congress to show compassion?  That's it?  In other words, no money, no ideas, no anything.  But we're sure going to feel sorry for those folks.  And with that, Africa is done.

What's next?  The Patriot Act.  Here we get a paragraph of half-truths and all-wrongs, and a conflation of the "War on Terrorism" with drug trafficking (hey, Mr. Bush, aren't you the one who said this wasn't a law enforcement action?) followed by the first real request of the evenining.

so I ask you to reauthorize the Patriot Act.

There you go, the first concrete proposal of the night is... exactly what Bush has been saying for two months.

This is followed by two paragraphs of defense of Bush's domestic spying without a warrant.  The only thing to be gleaned from these paragraphs is humor, as Bush goes through the entire program without even mentioning the words "warrant" or "domestic."

Somehow, in the twisted logic of Bush speechwriters, this program becomes a bridge to talking about the economy.  Guess what?  Bush says it's good.  So good, in fact, that the best thing we can possibly do is to do exactly what we've already done.  That, and pretend that the huge deficit doesn't exist.

Hold on.  Stop the presses.  This sounds like a proposal in the offing!

Tonight I will set out a better path -- an agenda for a Nation that competes with confidence -- an agenda that will raise standards of living and generate new jobs.
Could this be a major new policy?
Because America needs more than a temporary expansion, we need more than temporary tax relief. I urge the Congress to act responsibly, and make the tax cuts permanent.
Sorry, go back to sleep.  He didn't say anything you haven't already heard a thousand times.  This is followed by two hilarious paragraphs in which Bush tries to make his massive losses look better than the surpluses under Clinton.  Then there are a couple of punches toward Social Security and Medicare, but they're half-hearted.  Bush's fingers are still scorched from touching that third rail, and he doesn't seem in any hurry to grab it again.

After that, the speech turns into a conservative laundry list, but it's a list with no starch.  He touches on immigration reform and suggests... nothing.  He touches on health care and suggests... nothing.  

Finally, we get to energy.  Pre-speech pundits have been predicting that the heart of the speech is going to be dedicated to energy policy, so here at last, we stand a chance of encountering a little substance in a speech that so far has been lighter than whipped egg whites.

So tonight, I announce the Advanced Energy Initiative -- a 22-percent increase in clean-energy research at the Department of Energy
That's it.  That's the plan.  We're getting a speed-bump increase in the spending of research in a single government department.  This is Bush's entire plan for cutting our ties to foreign oil.

Sure, there's more talk about energy, but that's the whole plan.  At a time when America needed a new Apollo program, Bush offers us a bottle rocket.

After another lists of meaningless "encouragements" Bush closes on a note about the need for plain old "courage."

Too bad he didn't show any.


KEYWORDS: , , , , ,

Sign up for a Complimentary Member Account... Join the community! It's fast. And it'll allow you to take advantage of all this site's great features!

< Anti-War Activist Cindy Sheehan Arrested at SOTU Address | Cindy Sheehan's Statement on What Really Happened at the SOTU >
 Display:
That's all I can say about the speech.

Ugh.

No, wait ... I can say more. He had the nerve to scold Americans for using oil when he refuses to push higher fuel standards or fund lots of research for alternative energy sources. This is like your dope pusher scolding you for addiction.

The funny thing is, this absolutely lackluster speech -- and almost every major news outlet is saying it was lackluster -- is going to be the centerpiece of his new campaign road show, set to start shortly.

Frankly, I imagine it will go over about as well as his Social Security stump speeches. Meaning, not well at all. And I'm starting to have problems  as a taxpayer funding this road show crap. Just sit in Washington, Mr. President, and rinse, repeat, rinse, repeat, rinse, repeat. I'm sick of paying for a moveable propaganda feast that feeds us nothing but lies.

I guess I did have plenty to say after all, eh?

by SusanG on 02/01/2006 10:45:48 AM EST

is because his handlers forbade him from talking about going to war -- the only subject about which Bush ever seems impassioned.

Political Cortex -- Brain Food for the Body Politic

by Tom Ball on 02/01/2006 11:14:45 AM EST

[ Parent ]
work with had very little positive to say about SOTU.

The only thing they could site was a one-liner that Bush's speechwriter (who should be fired by the way) came up with that said something like, "Second-Guessing is no a policy".

Political Cortex -- Brain Food for the Body Politic

by Tom Ball on 02/01/2006 11:03:23 AM EST

That was his best line.

In the land of the blind, the one-eyed one-liner is king.

LOL

by Captain Marvel on 02/01/2006 11:05:07 AM EST

[ Parent ]
No, second guessing is not a policy.

Second guessing is reviewing where you could have done things better and learning from it.

I'm so entirely sick of America's infatuation with "steely resolve" -- from anyone -- I can't begin to describe it. All it covers up is intractable stubbornness, an unwillingness to admit mistakes and a refusal to learn from the past. Yet we glorify this behavior in our leaders -- which we certainly won't tolerate in our 5-year-old children.

Ugh. Again. Ugh.

by SusanG on 02/01/2006 11:43:40 AM EST

[ Parent ]
Is now considered a virtue.

Reviewing facts, checking assumptions, testing your ideas, and proceeding with care, are all signs of weakness.

by Devilstower on 02/01/2006 11:49:55 AM EST

[ Parent ]
 Display: