Sponsors

Plamegate: New Clues About Bob Novak's Anonymous Source Email Print

There are still many unsolved mysteries in Plamegate. The biggest? We still do not know the identity of the original leaker who disclosed Valerie Plame's status as a CIA agent to Robert Novak (Reporters have referred to this person as the mysterious "Mr. X").

Despite all that has been written about the story, and despite the fact that we have now learned much about Scooter Libby's unlawful leaking and subsequent perjury, as well as about Karl Rove's similar conduct (which remains under investigation), the identity of the Senior Administration Official who set this whole debacle in motion remains unknown.

Well, in the Libby Court hearing before Judge Walton  yesterday, we learned a little bit more.

Libby sought to learn the identify of an unnamed government official who revealed Plame's CIA status to not one but two journalists (a request the Court rejected as not pertinent to the Libby prosecution).  As recounted by the Washington Post:

Vice President Cheney's former top aide is not entitled to know the identity of an anonymous administration official who revealed information about CIA operative Valerie Plame to two journalists, a federal judge ruled in a hearing yesterday.

What we now seem to have learned for the first time is that Novak's source, Mr. X, is the same person who disclosed Valerie Plame's CIA status to Bob Woodward. Although the article doesn't state this definitively, it quotes anonymous sources as saying that they are in fact one and the same:

But Walton's decision to continue to protect the anonymity of one administration official, whom Libby's attorneys described as a confidential source about Plame for two reporters, one of them apparently Washington Post Assistant Managing Editor Bob Woodward, is a blow to Libby's case.

[snip]

Novak said in a speech in December that President Bush knew the identity of his source, and suggested that the official also was Woodward's source. Sources close to the leak investigation have said that Woodward and Novak received similar information from the same official.

Another important clue: According to defense attorneys, this Senior Administration Official did not work in the White House at the time of the leaks:

Defense attorneys in yesterday's hearing described the official as someone who did not work at the White House and was the source for two reporters.

I had previously thought that the original leaker, Mr. X, was Stephen Hadley, since he was up to his eyeballs in the White House pushback on Joe Wilson, and was the recipient of the Karl Rove "didn't take the bait" email regarding Rove's leak to Matt Cooper.  Also, a few news sites (Raw Story and the London Times), reported that Hadley was Woodward's Plame source, and Hadley refused to deny that fact (although an anonymous White House flack issued a denial on his behalf).  Unfortunately for that theory, however, Hadley was clearly in the White House at that time, so if the defense attorneys are correct this theory is wrong.

So who is it? Here is my analysis:

1. If it's not a White House source, that takes it out of the White House Iraq Group, and pushes it towards their allies in the CIA and State Department who had access to the information at that time as well.

2. Since the source was a "Senior" Administration Official, I believe that would take it out of the realm of low level aides and up to the Secretary and Deputy Secretary level.

3. Since the leak was clearly part of the White House's pushback on Wilson, it would have to be someone who was coordinating on that pushback.

So who could it be?  My money is now on George Tenet.  Tenet was Cheney's source for Valerie Plame's identity (As we learned from the Libby indictment and Murray Waas's subsequent reporting), so he clearly had that knowledge and knew it was important to the Administration.  Also, at that time, Tenet was heavily involved in the White House effort to shift blame for the Niger Uranium SOTU disaster -- issuing a statement in which the CIA took the blame for the providing the White House with faulty intelligence.  Moreover, if Tenet were Novak's source, that might explain why Novak ignored the instruction from CIA spokesman Bill Harlow not to disclose Plame's identity in his column. You certainly don't have to listen to a CIA PR flak if you have contrary direction from the CIA's Big Kahuna.

So what do you think -- was it Tenet? Do you agree or disagree with my analysis, and why?


KEYWORDS: , , ,

Sign up for a Complimentary Member Account... Join the community! It's fast. And it'll allow you to take advantage of all this site's great features!

< IRS to Vigorously Enforce Rules on Church Politicking | Bush, Inc.: "It's All About Me!" >
 Display:
I feel like a total fool that somehow I've missed this gem of a blog.  Wasting my time trolling through less deserving blogs, I somehow missed you.  But now that I've found you, I will be visiting a lot, for sure.

And now to the topic at hand, that was the best analysis I've heard yet.

I've been following this story, including writing a paper in Journalism Law two years ago.

I supposed Tenet could be considered someone who was not a political hired-gun, or whatever term Novak used.

I remember Woodward talking to Larry King or some other media guy and saying his source outed Plame without malice in his heart, in a "matter of fact fashion."

In the past, I suspected Bolton, especially after Bush did so many contortions to get him a job at the UN.  I felt as if Bolton was a "made man" in the Cheney-Bush Gambino family.

Oh well..we'll find out soon enough, I suppose.

Mimi

by notime4lies on 02/26/2006 04:38:58 AM EST

Amazing how we have to piece together all these little "hints" and details, isn't it?

I think Tenet is a good bet (and he's been on my list early on), or some lower-level compatriot of his (similar to Colin Powell's Wilkerson).

Why don't we pool together and buy Bob Novak's phone log?

I don't envy Fitz in trying to piece all of this together. Obfuscation, obfuscation, obfuscation.  It's a sign of how low we've sunk that Americans can't even access the truth--and even when we do, it takes 3 years or more to "prove it."

Taxes shall be levied according to ability to pay. That is the only American principle. FDR

by btyarbro on 02/25/2006 01:06:40 PM EST

I'm wondering about Tenet's motivation.  Saying he'd leak the ID of one of "his own" agents because he took the fall instead of letting Bush burn for his SOTU speech wherein he cited the false CIA intelligence on the Niger uranium sale to Iraq, seems prolix when questioning motive for burning an undercover operative.

Even Tenet seemed to characterize those 16 words as the case for taking our Nation to war.  And saying that the CIA made a mistake in letting them be included in the SOTU indicates to me that Tenet positions himself to take personal blame for an illegal war.

I'm familiar with falling on one's sword -- and in this case, it's certainly a huge sword.  But I 've never heard of a case of trying to take someone you don't even know with you by proxy when doing it -- if one chooses to believe Novak's article wherein he states that Tenet was ignorant of the choice of Wilson as envoi to Niger.

Yet, there's this tidbit from Fox News, Wednesday, October 26, 2005:

Wilson was reportedly on the administration's radar as a potential troublemaker before Novak identified his wife, Plame, on July 14, 2003. According to Tuesday's Times report, Cheney learned Plame's identity in a conversation about her husband with then-CIA Director George Tenet.

So, maybe I'm wrong.  But it would be nice to know the real reason behind Tenet's resignation.

by Limelite on 02/26/2006 01:09:40 PM EST

 Display: