Sponsors

GOP to Politicize Bush Administration's Crimes to Their Electoral Advantage Email Print

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
 
-- Benjamin Franklin

According to the US News Bulletin, "President Bush is disappointed but not surprised that Wisconsin Senator Russ Feingold has introduced a measure to censure him for authorizing surveillance of suspected terrorists in the United States without first obtaining warrants."

Nevertheless, Bush stands by his assertion that his crimes were in fact legal despite the fact that he admitted their illegality multiple times in the past.

The staunch footing is part of a greater set of political tactics: 1) never admit you're wrong -- one that the Administration has perfected 2) Insist that your motives are pure -- in this case that national security is being preserved 3) belittle the opposition -- that those who oppose the actions are cowards, incapable of securing the nation 4) Spin the events in your favor -- that the censure vote is merely a political assassination by a desperate opposition with nothing better to offer 5) ignore inconvenient facts -- FISA and the Constitution that serves as our laws' foundation.

TALKING POINT: It is extremely important to remember, the wiretaps could have been done exactly as they were -- but legally -- with court orders sought up to 3 days after the fact.  

In fact, according to this explanation, the program was not only illegal but unnecessarily puts the American people at risk.

If we know that U.S. persons are communicating with al Qaeda or al Qaeda affiliates, the surveillance would be approved by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court. (Remember, doing so would not slow the process down because you can obtain the approval up to 72-hours after the surveillance has begun.) Evidence obtained with a warrant from the FISA court, in most cases, can be used to charge and prosecute a suspect. In fact, Section 218 of the Patriot Act amended FISA to make it easier to introduce evidence obtained with a FISA warrant to prosecute people.

This is the best that White House strategists have to offer -- arguing "the censure issue could work to Bush's advantage. It could, they say, give the President's allies a fresh reason to portray the Democrats as zealots eager to destroy Bush's presidency. And if the Democrats took control of the House or Senate in this fall's mid-term elections, 'you'd see a lot more of this kind of thing -- attacks on the President,' says a senior GOP strategist. 'The Democrats would try to destroy the President's legacy throughout '07 and '08. They would grossly politicize everything.'"

And these tactics might work if Bush's approval wasn't cycling its way down the toilet.

Indeed, because of Bush's unpopularity, those congressional Republicans who would have at one time rushed to Bush's side, are now distancing themselves from "him on a variety of issues, ranging from immigration reform to the Dubai ports deal."

And though some senior White House officials are claiming that "The more people around the country know about this [censure], the more they feel it is an extreme position," I believe quite the opposite is true. For those who know what 'censure' is, I imagine the support is divided largely between party lines. For those who understand that a discussion has erupted regarding some sort of punishment to put the Administration in check, there is likely a feeling that "it's about time".

Not surprisingly, the Republicans are preemptively charging that a would-be congressional Democratic majority would attempt to 'destroy Bush's presidency' without any word of acknowledgement that Bush has already done that himself.


KEYWORDS: , ,

Sign up for a Complimentary Member Account... Join the community! It's fast. And it'll allow you to take advantage of all this site's great features!

< "The Strategy is Working" | Progressive Strategies >
 Display:
Bush May Have Mentioned Domestic NSA Program To Musharraf In 2001.

The Washington Post reports that "a brief passage" in Bob Woodward's book "Bush at War" raises the possibility that President Bush may have mentioned "the government's secret warrantless surveillance program to the president of Pakistan more than four years ago." Woodward wrote Bush "had become fascinated with the ability of the National Security Agency to intercept phone calls and other communications worldwide. If they got the key phone calls, future terrorism might be stopped, certainly curtailed. Bush summarized his strategy: 'Listen to every phone call and close them down and protect the innocents.'"

Political Cortex -- Brain Food for the Body Politic

by Tom Ball on 03/21/2006 12:11:27 PM EST

Woodward to be informed but forgodsake don't tell the American people!

by Embolden on 03/21/2006 01:45:03 PM EST

[ Parent ]
than Rove, Mehlman, Hughes, Bartlett, Cheney, Matalin and the state-owned FOX broadcast team  to spin Bush's record to GOP advantage.

I have no doubt they'll try (they're already out there), but they're scared, they're desperate, and they're WRONG.

Failed policies; failed Presidency.

It's really that simple.

Taxes shall be levied according to ability to pay. That is the only American principle. FDR

by btyarbro on 03/21/2006 12:41:46 PM EST

The problem is that the presidency was a failure for years, but that didn't halt his election in 2004.

With fear in the air, anything is possible. Let's just hope the American people are not the cowards the Bush administration thinks they are.

by Embolden on 03/21/2006 01:43:41 PM EST

[ Parent ]
 Display: