Sponsors

Bush: American Hero or America's Nero? Email Print

The president's base love to illustrate their points by citing parables.... well here is a parable to ponder.  Call it a "tale of failure foretold" if you like.  Let's compare Bush and Nero...

When he was installed, Nero was an adolescent, so the early part of his reign was characterized by direction from older figures like Seneca.

When he was installed, Bush had no foreign experience at all.   In fact, he had been outside the US of A only once before becoming president.    During the early years of his administration, policy was characterized by direction from older, more experienced hands like Cheney.

===

In 62 AD Tigellinus prompted Nero to pass a series laws known as "lex maiestatis" or (laws for the defense of the State) that were put to deadly use against anyone considered a threat although the primary victims were Christians.

In Oct. 2001, John Ashcroft  helped Bush push through Congress a series of radical changes to over 15 different statutes in the cynically named "Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism" Act, aka the "USAPATRIOT" Act.   These were put to use against anyone considered a threat although the primary victims were Muslims.

===  

In 64 A.D. a great fire left much of the city in ruins. Although it was widely rumored that Nero himself had the fires set, that was never proven. However, it is true his ambitious building campaign following the fires represented to many an exercise in private selfishness at a time when public reconstruction was needed most.

In Sept. 2001, a great fire left much of New York's financial district in ruins, the Pentagon was also severely damaged.    While it was rumored that Bush himself had been warned of the attack, it was never proven. However, it is true his ambitious campaign to revamp government following the attacks represented to many the realization of a private agenda shrouded in secrecy at a time when public policies based in honesty were needed most.

===

In 65 A.D. Nero's artistic inclinations, present since his accession, became truly public, and in a display which shocked conservative tastes he appeared on stage and sang for audiences.

In March 2004 Bush's comedic pretensions shocked the public when he appeared on stage and joked about the absence of WMD in Iraq.

That was shocking, but the real kicker came the following year.

In Sept. 2005 Bush's shocked the public with another politically tone-deaf performance when he appeared at a Republican fund-raiser strumming a guitar while New Orleans drowned.

===

In 67 A.D. Nero left Rome for a tour of Greece, during which his extravagances alienated him further still from general citizens and military commanders alike.    More crucially, in his paranoia he ordered a popular and successful general to commit suicide, a decision which left other provincial leaders in doubt about his next move and inclined toward rebellion rather than inaction.

In Feb. 2003, while still at war in Afghanistan, Bush mobilized troops with the intention of using Iraq as a "test case" for the so-called "Bush Doctrine" of preemptive war against potential threats.    The grandiose plans alienated him further still from general citizens and former military commanders alike.   In his drive to promote this agenda he ordered a popular and successful former general to commit political suicide in front of the UN Security Council.   This decision left other alliance leaders in doubt about his next move and inclined toward rebellion rather than inaction.

===

In 68 A.D. Vindex revolted in Gaul on principle.   Clodius Macer followed suit in Africa, but for purely opportunistic reasons.   Galba  declared his allegiance to the Senate and the Roman people, rather than to Nero.   Such unrest in the provinces, coupled with intrigue at Rome among the praetorians provided Nero's enemies, especially within the Senate, with their chance to depose him.   He committed suicide.

In March 2004, The "Coalition of the Willing" began to splinter.   Spain revolted, as did Poland, Honduras and others.    The next year, Uzbekistan declared its allegiance to the Shanghai Cooperation Organization and forced US troops to leave the country.   Such unrest provided Bush's adversaries with a chance to assert their view of a "multi-polar" world.

===

In 69 A.D. Rome descended into Civil War... a period known as the "Year of the Four Emperors (Nero, Otho, Galba, and Vespasian).   For many, this marks the end of the "Golden Age" of Rome.  

Moving forward, a storm is gathering.   The radical policy commonly referred to as "The Bush Doctrine" is driving countries normally at each others throats into each others arms.   A consequence of this realignment may be for OPEC members to decide their future is better assured  by cooperating with members of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization.    One consequence of that relationship would be for OPEC to denominate oil in euros instead of dollars.    For many, that would mark the end of America's global hegemony.

===

"We learn from history that we do not learn from history."
- Hegel


KEYWORDS: , , , , , , ,

Sign up for a Complimentary Member Account... Join the community! It's fast. And it'll allow you to take advantage of all this site's great features!

< Why your vote counts -- John Conyers as House Judiciary Chair. | Terrorism: A New Definition for an Evolving Weapon >
 Display:
In 64 A.D. a great fire left much of the city in ruins, and while it is not certain that Nero himself had the fires set, it is true his ambitious building campaign that followed the fires represented to many an exercise in private selfishness at a time when public reconstruction was most needed.

The accusations that Nero had something to do with the fire or that he "fiddled" (really quoted poetry) while Rome burned are calumnies that aristocratic writers said to discredit him. He DID take advantage of the ruins to build his "Golden House," and that opened him up to criticism. But in all other ways he handled the fire right. Something that he doesn't get credit for. In reality it was one of the very few things he handled well.

Nero was out of Rome when the fire happened. He rushed back when he heard and spent a great deal of time actually helping fight the fire. It is thought that in a moment while resting between exertions that Nero quoted from one of his own poems about the beauty of fire, and this single verse quoted between firefighting efforts is the origin of the "fiddled while Rome burned" myth.

After the fire, Golden House land grab aside, Nero put great effort into rebuilding Rome and initiated some of the only building codes and fire safety codes of the ancient world, ones that probably helped prevent repeats of the great fire.

In terms of the land grab, such actions were common in the Roman aristicracy--finding a fire and bidding low to the distraught owner. Marcus Crassus was famous for this, probably making his fortune this way...and possibly having his goons set fires before swooping in to fleece the panicked owner. So, Nero was not alone even in the worst of his actions. But one thing is clear, however bad Nero was, he did better than Bush in dealing with a great catastrophe.

Read the Progressive Democrat

by mole333 on 03/07/2006 02:03:13 PM EST

That is particularly important because almost everything we know about Tigellius is from Tacitus.  

Having said that, I suspect the fact the conflagration re-erupted on Tigellinus' estate in the Aemilian district fueled speculation among contemporary conspiracy theorists that Nero had a role either in starting or prolonging the blaze. His subsequent land grab may have been taken as confirmation of those suspicions.  That would certainly explain Tacitus' later insinuation that Tigellinus was an arsonist.

But returning to the Nero/Bush comparison:

Without disputing your point about the response of Nero in terms of building codes, etc., it is notable that after the fires, both Bush and Nero sought scapegoats.

Nero went after Christians, even though he had no evidence to blame them.

Bush went after Iraq, even though he had no evidence to blame them.

A recent FBI search warrant reveals Republicans refer to themselves as the Corrupt Bastards Club!

by 8ackgr0und N015e on 03/08/2006 11:58:04 AM EST

[ Parent ]
The only real difference is that Nero actually footed the bill to rebuild and enforced better building codes. Bush neglects rebuilding and lowers standards.

Read the Progressive Democrat

by mole333 on 03/08/2006 06:22:31 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Nero lowered taxes for the masses to win their support.

Bush lowered taxes for the wealthy to win their support.

A recent FBI search warrant reveals Republicans refer to themselves as the Corrupt Bastards Club!

by 8ackgr0und N015e on 03/09/2006 12:51:14 PM EST

[ Parent ]
share several important similarities:  both are narcissitic, self-absorbed, haunted by past "enemies," determined to blame others, and out of control tyrants with difficulties recognizing and accepting political realities.

Nicely done.  I've often thought such a comparison should be thrust into the forefront, and I'm glad you did it.

Send it to FOX.

Taxes shall be levied according to ability to pay. That is the only American principle. FDR

by btyarbro on 03/10/2006 11:16:30 AM EST

 Display: