Sponsors

Who Decided To Sack the Army? Email Print

Generals who have chosen to speak out against Donald Rumsfeld have mentioned two of the biggest strategic mistakes made in the Iraq war (beyond going to war based on bull in the first place). The mistakes? Not going in with a large enough force to maintain the peace once the regime fell, and disbanding the Iraqi army.

I have one simple question that I have not heard a single reporter ask yet. Who made the decision to disband the Iraqi army?

When Medea Benjamin (founder of Global Exchange and Occupation Watch) returned from a trip to U.S. occupied Iraq soon after Baghdad fell, one of the key things she mentioned in her talks about the situation was the mistake the CPA (Coalition Provisional Authority whom she referred to as the failed Texas businessmen running the apltly-named "Repbulican Palace") made in disbanding the Iraqi army. Military psy-ops had dropped leaflets across the country before the war started, telling Iraqi soldiers that if they took off their uniforms and stayed home when the bombing started, and didn't fight U.S. troops as they entered the country, the Iraqi troops could be partners in rebuilding a new, free Iraq.

When those troops did exactly as the leaflets asked, and didn't fight back, U.S. troops easily took the entire country. That's why George Bush was able to, mistakenly as it turns out, declare "Mission Accomplished" so quickly.

Yet when the Iraqi soldiers began lining up outside of U.S. military encampments, asking where they should report for duty,  they were told to go home. The old Iraqi military wasn't welcome any more. No fruit cup for them! No job, no food, no hope, no future..... Oh, but they still had their weapons and knew where all the old bases and ammunition dumps were..... Oh.... and because we didn't have enough troops on the ground of our own, we couldn't guard those old bases and ammo dumps....... Oh...... and because we didn't have enough troops on the ground and had disbanded the Iraqi military we had no one to guard the huge borders of Iraq from foreign insurgents from streaming in..... Oh.......... It just gets worse and worse, doesn't it?

Who made that decision? That was a KEY strategic decision someone at the top had to have made. Who? Does that person still have a job? What was that person thinking?

And... how dare Condi Rice blame the grunts on the ground for Iraq's troubles by saying "thousands of tactical mistakes were made." STRATEGIC decisions are the cause of this mess.

We know who decided to go into Iraq with a smaller U.S. force than many of the generals had asked for. That was Donald, I'll send as many troops as the generals tell me, Rumsfeld (liar, liar, liar). Was he also the one who decided to disband the Iraqi army?

Americans deserve to know the answer to that question.

The only possible result of disbanding the Iraqi army, for any thinking person to imagine, was a bunch of disgruntled, armed, and dangerous men who would end up taking up arms and attacking the occupiers and each other (look at all the militias that have formed). What other possible outcome could anyone have expected? That being the case, the next question that comes to mind is: Did the person who made that decision do so KNOWING that it would cause a civil war?

Is it too frightening to speculate that someone in Washington DC wanted Iraq to remain unstable and fall into chaos?

Let's just demand an answer to the first question for now, though. Who decided to disband the Iraqi army? OK - White House press corps..... that's your question of the day. Rummy????


KEYWORDS: , , ,

Sign up for a Complimentary Member Account... Join the community! It's fast. And it'll allow you to take advantage of all this site's great features!

< Reckless Reporting? Point the finger at yourself, chump. | Blogorama on the Religious Right >
 Display:
According to Bremer's book My Year in Iraq, both Rumsfeld and Bush approved the decision.

by David Tomlin on 04/22/2006 06:32:25 AM EST

 Display: