Sponsors

Tom DeLay Resigns in Disgrace -- Scurries off to Virginia Email Print

After spending his victorious primary night partying with his lobbyist buddies, Representative Tom DeLay has decided to call it quits.

Uh, oh! Someone knows something about Tom DeLay that Tom DeLay doesn't want anyone to know.  

So what does he do? Why, the only thing that comes naturally to him -- he ran away -- to Virginia to partake in their delicious hams, their proximity to K-Street, and their distance from Travis County District Attorney Ronnie Earle.

It's true. The former House Republican Majority Leader has abandoned his reelection bid and is expected to resign from the House within the next few weeks. DeLay said "his decision was best for his district and based on troubling internal polling numbers" which "showed him beating Democrat Nick Lampson in the general election but in a race that would be too close for comfort."

Although the whimpering poll numbers are a convenient scapegoat for his resignation, most politically astute Americans are well aware of the scandals plaguing DeLay and they understand the strategic necessity of dumping the DeLay trash before it's stench destroys the GOP altogether.

According to the Galveston County Daily News, DeLay's exit "robs Democrats of a handy target for national attacks on the Republican Party and may take the national spin off the race." In an interview with Time magazine, DeLay said, "I'm a realist. I've been around awhile. I can evaluate political situations. And it was obvious to me that the 22nd District needed an election that discussed issues. It was obvious to me that this election had become a referendum on me. ... I just felt like I didn't want to risk the seat and that I can do more on the outside of the House than I can on the inside right now."

Of course "Political Corruption" IS an issue.

Nevertheless, a DeLay departure (From both he House and the state) will allow Republican Texas Governor Rick Perry to appoint a successor to DeLay's seat until the November elections - thus offering incumbent status to a fresh Republican face in a staunchly Republican congressional district.

But why now?

The Dallas Morning News is reporting that "the final straw was apparently the plea deal entered Friday by a former deputy chief of staff, Tony Rudy, the third confidant to turn government witness in an ongoing federal corruption inquiry centered on super-lobbyist Jack Abramoff."

Already, "Thirteen House Republicans... have returned or plan to return contributions they took from lobbyist Tony Rudy, who pleaded guilty to conspiracy last week and joins former cohort Jack Abramoff as a possible witness in the government's expanding corruption probe of lawmakers and their aides." Of the "34 House Republicans whose campaigns or PACs received money from Rudy since 2001, the offices of six members told The Hill they do not plan to return the contributions or donate them to charity." Rudy "spread his contributions among a wide swath of the GOP conference, giving $48,500 since 2001 to four members of leadership, two committee chairmen and then-Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-Texas), Rudy's boss from 1995 to 2000."

As a final blow, the conservative Opinion Journal rightly opines, "If Republicans lose their House majority because GOP voters stay home in disgust, Team DeLay will be one of the reasons."

...one of the many reasons.


See also: The Hammer :: Federal Probe Has Edged Closer to Texan


KEYWORDS: , , , , , ,

Sign up for a Complimentary Member Account... Join the community! It's fast. And it'll allow you to take advantage of all this site's great features!

< Ralph Reed on the Rocks | United Church of Christ Ad Faces More Rejection >
 Display:
That was going to be my headline for a follow-up.

I'm a little slow these days on postings, but here are some jewels I found:

Some excerpts from the Time interview:

Asked if he had done anything illegal or unethical in public office, DeLay replied curtly, "No." Asked if he'd done anything immoral, he said with a laugh, "We're all sinners." Asked what he would do differently, he said, "Nothing."  

Some people never learn.

And this:

I have learned how to make major decisions. I think the real major decision I had to make like this was whether to run for Speaker or not, when Newt (Gingrich) stepped aside. '98, wasn't it? It was quite obvious that's not what I was supposed to be doing, and I felt very good about it. There's many reasons why I shouldn't have been Speaker. Not to sound arrogant, but I could have walked in, and I could have been Speaker. But at the time, we had foster kids.  .  .  .  I'd just been the main guy who (chuckles) impeached Bill Clinton and all that other stuff.

Here's one of my favorites:

When I was elected to Congress, I was a self-centered jerk.

(So, what has changed?)

As for his plans for the future:

The people that go to church understand that a country has to be based on some sort of religion and fear of God because they understand that.

(Notice--not love of God, fear of God.)

And here's all Bush managed to contribute in his discussion with DeLay on Monday:

At the White House, U.S. President (George W.) Bush said DeLay's announcement "had to have been a very difficult decision for someone who loved representing his district in the state of Texas. I wish him all the very best and I know he's looking to the future."

Asked if it would hurt the Republican party, Bush said: "My own judgment is that our party will continue to succeed because we're the party of ideas."

Party of ideas?  Umm, corruption, greed, lying, hiding, cowardice, denials, mismanagement, incompetence, . . . well, I guess a feller could get some ideas from that.

Here's what you won't hear him say:

DeLay has assembled a substantial legal team to fight back, and he has a defense fund -- financed largely by corporations with business before Congress -- that contained more than $600,000 at the end of last year, based on the cumulative record of its receipts and contributions. But contributions to the fund dropped from $318,000 to $181,500 between the third and fourth quarters of 2005.

DeLay also is entitled under federal election rules to convert any or all of the remaining funds from his reelection campaign to his legal expenses, whether or not he resigns, is indicted or loses the election. Election lawyers say one advantage of bowing out of the election now is that the campaign cash can be converted to pay legal bills immediately, instead of being drained in the course of a bid to stay in office.

And so it goes.

Taxes shall be levied according to ability to pay. That is the only American principle. FDR

by btyarbro on 04/04/2006 03:11:29 PM EST

Too good for a comment!

Political Cortex -- Brain Food for the Body Politic

by Tom Ball on 04/04/2006 04:54:49 PM EST

[ Parent ]
 Display: