Sponsors

GITMO and American Embarassment Email Print

As a disabled American veteran, I am appalled by the detention camp that is in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. It was plainly stated that when they created it there, it was for the purpose of ensuring that these men could not be brought before American Courts.

This is a nation based on laws, and we hold that belief that all men are created equal. Yet, we as a nation condone the President, Vice President and Secretary of Defense. In their position that the men held here are not subject to American law.
The promised military tribunals have not been held, some of these men have been held five years already. When do they get their day in court?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/ news/main.jhtml?xml=news/2 006/05/19/uguantanamo.xml&a mp;sSheet=/news/2006/05/19 ixnews.html

As a soldier who voluntarily joined the military in October 1973, I took the oath all soldiers take, to uphold the constitution and the laws of this nation. Against all enemies foreign and domestic.

The office holders who are responsible for GITMO took the same or a very similar oath of office. I don't remember a line in the oaths, that allowed for the oath takers to create their own laws in addition to the constitutions or what Congress had passed.

To have these men reduce America to the point where it is being compared to the old Soviet Union and even the pre war German government, is particularly distubing to me as a disabled veteran. This is not what I sacrificed for. I believe in the law, and the fact that all men and women in America, have to obey the same laws, why do these men feel they are above it? Are they smarter than 225 years of collective wisdom, it took to put in place the laws we now obey?

These men have brought to this nation terms, like Gulag, rendition, torture, abuse, Abu Grahib.

Are these men in GITMO evil? And do they deserve to be in jail, some I am sure, but why not put them in front of a court and sentence them, if they desire to execute them, judge them and do it.

If you are going to sentence them to 30 years, send them to SuperMax, or Leavenworth, the Government owns stockades all over this nation, that can hold these men, appropriately. But give them the decency of telling them when they are going to be released if ever, their families deserve that much deceny, from the greatest nation on earth.

I will be glad when someone, anyone returns honor and dignity to the White House, because this occupant sure hasn't, I liked Nixon better, at least when he knew he was in  trouble he did the decent thing and resigned, this guy is too stupid to do that.

Has anyone else noticed the same players around Nixon are the same ones around W, Cheney and Rumsfeld were in the Office of Economic Opportunity, they were part of this nations last presidential disaster, and here they are on the sister ship of the Titanic, only it's three decades later, and this time they are the First mates.


KEYWORDS: , , , ,

Sign up for a Complimentary Member Account... Join the community! It's fast. And it'll allow you to take advantage of all this site's great features!

Poll

Gitmo should be
closed 17%
W, Cheney and Rummy need to resign 2%
impeach them all 79%
can we hold a special election to replace them 0%

Votes: 67
Results | Other Polls
< Mything the point of "Positive Results" | Republicans Quietly attack Disabled Veterans SSD >
 Display:
Dear Friend,

Thank you for your service and for speaking out. I too am a veteran (US Air Force 1979-1987).

I traveled to Afghanistan soon after the Taliban fell as part of an interfaith peace delegation. One of the things I heard from several folks there, was that warlords and other tribal leaders were offered money and other incentives to turn in people who had fought against the Northern Alliance or who had helped the Taliban in any way. In some cases, I heard, the warlords and tribal leaders identified innocent people, just so they could get the cash, the incentives, or settle old disputes. Hundreds of prisoners from GITMO have been freed already, including children who were there for two years.

Since there have been no trials, and our government has refused to shed any light on the reasons for each person's detention, it is really unfair to say that most, or many, or any of the detainees are "evil." Those holding them endlessly without trial or access to lawyers.......

Craig Wiesner Educational Products for Peace and Social Justice www.reachandteach.com

by accidentalactivist on 05/19/2006 07:39:11 PM EST

There is absolutely no supreme law of the land when one is put on the railroad train to show where Congress, using the theory of aggregation, includes into the legislative history of USC844(e)the word fire in 1982. Making the statutes major element by fire and explosive.

David W. Bouchard Esq. I have now found the case: Jones v. United States, that you and the Supreme Court groupie, J. Harvie Wilkinson the third, railroaded me all the way to the Supreme Court for.

http://supct.law.cornell.ed u/supct/html/99-5739.ZO.htm l#FN4SRC

by jlspruill on 05/28/2006 04:22:25 PM EST

There is absolutely no supreme law of the land when one is put on the railroad train to show where Congress, using the theory of aggregation, includes into the legislative history of USC844(e)the word fire in 1982. Making the statutes major element by fire and explosive.

David W. Bouchard Esq. I have now found the case: Jones v. United States, that you and the Supreme Court groupie, J. Harvie Wilkinson the third, railroaded me all th
e way to the Supreme Court for.

/0
/1
/2
/3
/4
/5
/6
/7
/8
/9
/10
/11
/12
/13
/14
/15

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30

31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50

51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65

66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81

82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99

0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

59
60
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88

30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58

89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119

0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29

30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45

46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59

by davidsebasy on 02/03/2007 11:33:09 AM EST

 Display: