James Webb's Senate Candidacy Poses Timely Questions Email Print

One of the interesting U.S. Senate candidacies of the 2006 primary season along with Ned Lamont's challenge against Senator Joseph Lieberman in Connecticut is that of James Webb in Virginia.  Should Webb win the Democratic primary his opponent would be Senator George Allen, a Cheney-Bush Republican currently seeking to run away from his roots, given Bush's recent dismal polling numbers.

If one Democrat of all those seeking office at this stage of the 2006 political sweepstakes could be selected who would typify everything that strategist Karl Rove fears as a candidate it would figure to be James Webb.  

An even cursory analysis of Webb's personal and political biography reveals why Rove and the Republican attack machine would have significant reason to worry in the face of a Webb candidacy in the fall election.

James Webb is a Naval Academy graduate who fought in the Vietnam War and won medals for courage and valor.  Webb served with the 5th Marine Regiment in Vietnam as a rifle platoon and company commander, receiving the Navy Cross, the second highest award in the Navy, along with the Silver Star Medal, two Bronze Stars, and two Purple Hearts.  

Webb left the Marine Corps in 1972 and wrote his first book while a law student at Georgetown University, where he received a degree of Doctor of Jurisprudence in 1975.  

He served as Assistant Secretary of Defense for Reserve Affairs during the Reagan Administration and was Secretary of the Navy during the 1987-1988 interval.  Webb resigned as Secretary of the Navy after refusing to agree to reduce the size of the Navy.

After his government service Webb became a best selling fiction author, writing novels  about the military life he knew so well, beginning with the 1978 work, Fields of Fire, structured heavily on personal experience and dealing with a platoon of Marines serving in Vietnam in the late sixties.  

He wrote the story and became executive producer for the 2000 film, Rules of Engagement, starring Tommy Lee Jones and Samuel L. Jackson.  

A current Warner Brothers production being directed and produced by Rob Reiner, Whiskey River, is an adaptation of a Webb script.  It is a story about a fictional American soldier injured in Iraq.  

Considering the foregoing, the Rove smear brigade would be facing the same kind of dilemma with James Webb as Republicans confronted with another Marine, former UN weapons inspector Scott Ritter.  

Republicans knew how futile and absurd it would be to attempt to link tough talking and tough minded Ritter to the normal boiler plate smear of pacifist, quiche eater, ivory tower wine and cheese indulger that has been presented ad nauseum when their war policies are challenged.

In the case of Ritter certain Republicans chose to question his sanity.  Undaunted, Ritter turned the argument back on his shameful and baseless accusers.  After all, does squinty-eyed Donald Rumsfeld or glassy-eyed George W. Bush loom as models of probity and coolly reasoned logic?  

With Webb not only having achieved in so many different areas, along with compiling an admirable record for bravery on the battlefield, as well as having served in an administration headed by that icon of the right, Ronald Reagan, how much of a target does the former Marine provide for the likes of Rove?  

It would be delightful to see fearless computer terminal warriors such as Dick Cheney, Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz, or even George W. Bush himself, all of whom avoided Vietnam conflict, seek to lecture Webb about military policy and strategy.  

The same could be said for media warriors such as Charles Krauthammer, George Will, Rush Limbaugh and Bill O'Reilly, none of whom saw any military action in Vietnam or anywhere else.

In Webb's campaign he has raised two important points that bear sober reflection.  He trains his guns on the pseudo militarists and tough talkers whose twisted intellectual creativity spawned freedom toast on Air Force One and freedom fries on the ground.  

One major point Webb recently made was that the Republican Party has outlived its usefulness and is in a rapidly decaying state.  The evidence is clear, manifested by bankrupt policies at home and abroad with raging debt, corporate corruption among those financing Republican campaigns, and deceit abroad as war is launched on flagrant misrepresentations.  

A second point was a grim shot across the bow that assuredly rattled vulnerable Republicans.  Webb stated that a major reason for seeking a Senate seat is to combat the kinds of politicians that cost the lives of men with whom he served in Vietnam.

So there you have it, Rove and the rest of the Republican campaign command.  Here is a man who served with distinction and is less than enamored with the policies of the self-professed, professional pro-America patriots who have sought to claim the flag as their sole possession while smearing those who oppose them.  


KEYWORDS: , , , ,

Sign up for a Complimentary Member Account... Join the community! It's fast. And it'll allow you to take advantage of all this site's great features!

< The Road to Hell is Paved with Republicans' Alleged Good Intention! | See the U.S.A. in Dazzling Decay >
 Display:
that no one wrote a column like this during Wes Clark's '04 candidacy, since his credentials are so similar--except that the former NATO Supreme Allied Commander's resume trumps Webb's.  But similar all the same, right down to the books written, except that Clark's are non-fiction.  I assumed at the time, for the very reasons you listed, that Clark as the Democratic presidential nominee would be Karl Rove's worst nightmare.

Apparently Rove's corporate media agreed, which is why we got a virtual news blackout on Clark from the time he announced, bursting through the starting gate by polling ahead of every other candidate.  Yet the Democratic powers-that-be, in their infinite wisdom, decided to instead anoint a weak Northeastern senator (as if that hadn't  been tried and found wanting before).  

So where were you then, Mr. Hare?  

by mgm on 06/05/2006 12:39:42 AM EST

Were you reading my articles then?  I was covering the campaign and, if I recall, I analyzed Clark in the same context as I now have Webb.  The site was then called PoliticalStrategy.com.

Let us also remember one important fact.  Kerry  was talking tough and saying things like "bring it on" during the primary season to solidify his vote, especially among the Dean supporters, and in the process Clark actually lost support he may have otherwise received with his military record and experience.  That was certainly all calculated.  A different Kerry emerged in the general election, right down to not emphatically responding to and putting in their respective places the smear-laden Swift Boaters led by O'Neill and Corso.

Bill Hare

by Bill Hare on 06/05/2006 09:59:58 PM EST

[ Parent ]
for the article.  Sorry about the tardiness of the response.  I just buzzed in and saw it.  This does make one ponder about just what might happen this time around in 2008, with Iraq more of a burning issue now than in 2004 with all that has occurred there in the interim.

Bill Hare

by Bill Hare on 06/10/2006 09:42:09 PM EST

 Display: