Sponsors

The YOYO Handcuffs Email Print

Here's a test: name one economic policy, other than tax cuts, associated with outgoing Treasury Secretary John Snow.

Give up?

Now think about this: what is the economic policy of the Bush administration? What about the Congress? What about the Democrats?

If all you could come up is that the first two aforementioned groups want to cut rich people's taxes, I'm with you. Beyond that, none of the above has offered a coherent strategy for meeting America's economic challenges.

And these problems are prodigious: global economic competition; 46 million people lacking health insurance; the seemingly inexorable climb of inequality; obscene CEO compensation packages totally unrelated to performance; an economy that's doing fine, until you consider the people in it.

Each of these problems needs concerted thought and action. But while the administration's new nominee for Treasury Secretary, Henry Paulson, is certainly an able economist, he will likely be as ineffectual as was Secretary Snow.

There's a reason why the nation's economic policymakers are suffering from a deficit of ideas: It's YOYO economics.

YOYO is an acronym for "You're on your own," and it is the guiding light of economic policy as practiced today. The idea is that no matter what the problem is, the solution is less government and more markets.  You've seen many examples of YOYOism in action, but here's a primer:

Problem: The looming health care crisis.

YOYO solution: individualized Health Savings Accounts, designed to create better "health care shoppers."

Problem: The economic insecurity associated with globalization.

YOYO solution: more education. If you're not smart enough to compete with cheaper, skilled workers abroad, well, "you're on your own."

Problem: Solvency in your old age.

YOYO solution: Try your hand in the stock market with a private account.

And underlying all of this is the biggest YOYO tactic of all: cut taxes to the point where government is forced to contract so there's no question of an activist agenda. If you can enrich your donors along the way...well, then it's a "twofer."

The problem is, as is becoming undeniably clear, YOYOism doesn't work. It failed lethally in New Orleans. It's done nothing to stop the growth of the uninsured, the rise in poverty, the decline in median earnings (i.e., the real earnings of the typical worker, down 2% over the recovery, while productivity is up 15%), nor the rise in the profit share of national income, now at a 39-year high.  The public rejected it with the failure of the Bush-push to privatize Social Security, and now the polls show deep dissatisfaction with the president's management of the economy.

There's a countervailing message rising out of the anxiety generated by the new economy:

"Policy makers, work with us. We're in this together. Rebuild a government that we can believe in, and we will do so. Conceive and articulate an agenda that harnesses the tremendous capacity, skill, and flexibility of our economy to meet the challenges. Instead of creating 300 million individual risk-bearing silos, let's pool risk though universal health insurance coverage and a strengthened pension system. Let's build an ambitious public/private partnership with the goal of energy independence to replace the jobs and wages lost to globalization."

You have to strain to hear this message, but it's there. It is, however, in desperate need of amplification.  The new treasury secretary can't help--his hands are tied by YOYO ideology. So the question is: who will step up and amplify this liberating message?


KEYWORDS: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Sign up for a Complimentary Member Account... Join the community! It's fast. And it'll allow you to take advantage of all this site's great features!

< The Revelations of John Q. Public (revealed 06/06/06) | Diagnosing Ann Coulter's Affliction >
 Display:
Democrats have been looking for ideas that will appeal to a broad base. This is it. YOYO economics is an idea everyone can understand and get behind, and I think it has genuine potential to unite the party.

Manifest Dignity!

by breakingranks on 06/07/2006 05:43:34 PM EST

Open Letter to John Edwards

I just received a letter from John Edwards soliciting donations for the Democratic Party and answer him thusly:

The unprovoked attack on Iraq was a war crime. The occupation of Iraq is an atrocity replete with torture and the slaughter of innocents. Your letter tells me that you could have done it better. The United States is the only country capable of ending the manufacture and stockpiling of nuclear weapons. The dictator of North Korea requested a meeting with us to discuss nuclear disarmament but he was ignored. Our tax dollars have provided Israel with over 100 nuclear bombs and started an arms race in the Middle East. The hypocritical stance of a country, that is continuing the manufacture of these horrors and wants  to threaten Iran with a nuclear attack is a shame to all honest Americans.

The New World Order established by the WTO, The World Bank, and NAFTA is not just making international borders meaningless for the hordes of immigrants, legal and illegal, who are leaving the poverty of Third World countries that have had their economies destroyed, but are causing riots in France and massive demonstrations in the United States. Neither fences nor armed force can stop such a demographic shift of populations.
The Democratic Party in its role as friendly opposition is not to be trusted. It does not propose to end the production of nuclear weapons nor will it take a forthright stand to remove our storm troopers from Iraq. The only reason that it has not gotten more corporation money is because it has been a loser. When it takes back the House and Senate the Wall Street dollars will once again flow in.

Nothing in this scenario is going to stop global warming nor a thermonuclear war.

 Gramps

by gramps on 06/08/2006 07:10:53 AM EST

[ Parent ]
 Display: