Ralph Reed vs. Joe Lieberman

But he lost decisively 55-45, in the wake of exposure of his ties to his pal, convicted crook Jack Abramoff. Indeed, Reed was attacked hard by his opponent, State Senator Casey Cagle, who highlighted how Reed took $5.3 million from Abramoff's gambling industry clients -- claiming not to know where the money was coming from. Cagle even went so far as to publicly suggest that Reed might be indicted in connection with the scandal.
Tough politics. Nevertheless, Reed offered a gracious concession statment, and promised to work for the GOP ticket in the fall. "Stay in the fight," Reed told his supporters. "Don't retreat. And our values will win in November."
This stands in dramatic contrast to three term Democratic Senator Joe Lieberman of Connecticut -- once a star of the Democratic party.
Faced with a strong primary challenger in Ned Lamont, who is supported by Democrats tired of, among other things, Lieberman's rightist drift and anti-Democratic Party activism, Leiberman has taken out papers to run as a third party, independent candidate for the Senate in the (increasingly likely) event he loses the primary. So Ralph Reed, whose promising career in electoral politics was derailed, perhaps forever, by this bitter primary loss, promised to support the GOP ticket in the fall. But Joe Lieberman, who has been supported by the Democratic Party at all levels -- bolts at the first sign of a possible loss in the party primary.
What a guy.
KEYWORDS: Ralph Reed, Joe Leiberman
Sign up for a Complimentary Member Account... Join the community! It's fast. And it'll allow you to take advantage of all this site's great features!
| < Dubya Dubya Three: When the 'War on Terror' Just Isn't Enough! | Bush Vetoes Stem Cell Bill: Issues Signing Statement Preserving Perfect Record > |



