Sponsors

Stoller and Sirota Get it WRONG on Rahm Emanuel Email Print

Matt Stoller and David Sirota are exercised about a passage in Newsweek, which they say makes the Democrats look corrupt.  The passage quotes Rahm Emmanual about his efforts to raise funds from financial professionals in heretofore untapped industries, such as hedge funds and private equity funds.  The passage reads as follows:

As a member of the Ways and Means Committee, Emanuel teamed with Senate campaign chair Chuck Schumer to tap uncharted donor fields in the financial industry. "We're working outside of traditional banks,' he says proudly, 'into the private-equity world, the hedge-fund world, the distressed-debt world." These 'worlds' know they are talking to a guy who not only runs the campaign committee, but who could be in the majority of the key financial committee--and maybe even majority leader.

From this passage, Sirota draws the conclusion that Emmanual is:

gushing about how great he's been at leveraging the prospect of him as a chief lawmaker on a powerful committee to rake in cash from special interests.

And that Emmanual is:

bragging to reporters about Democratic Party corruption

Stoller agrees, and says:

Congressman Emanuel is offering high-dollar donors the chance to bribe him in Time Magazine, a little less than two months before an election in which corruption is supposedly going to play a role.

Sirota and Stoller, unfortunately, both lack basic reading comprehension skills.  If you read the passage again, you'll see that all Emmanual actually says is the following:

"We're working outside of traditional banks,' he says proudly, 'into the private-equity world, the hedge-fund world, the distressed-debt world."

That's it. The additional language about Emanual being on key financial committess comes entirely from the Newsweek reporter, who, in typical MSM media fashion, is offering his negative take on Emmanual's comment, and is trying to imply, without any evidence whatsoever, that Emanuel is engaged in some kind of implicit shakedown.

Rahm is doing exactly what we want a Democratic House leader to do.  He is reaching out to people of means in a relatively new industry -- hedge funds and private equity funds -- and soliciting donations.  Many of these people are highly progressive and hostile to the Iraq war and the Bush administration's incompetant reign of error.  To bash Rahm because a MSM media twerp wants to put a negative spin on Emanual's comment, and to accuse him of bragging about bribing these people -- when such an accusation is patently false -- is not only morally wrong but also extremely counterproductive, considering we're within 60 days of the election.

Stoller and Sirota, who failed to even link to the correct Newsweek article, should be a little more careful next time before shooting from the hip at elected Democrats.


KEYWORDS: , ,

Sign up for a Complimentary Member Account... Join the community! It's fast. And it'll allow you to take advantage of all this site's great features!

< MA Gov: Deval Patrick Leads in the Stretch | Danforth Says He is No Longer Obtuse about the Christian Right >
 Display:
I think it is you who has it wrong regardless of whether Stolla and Sirota got their points wrong or not. Rahm Emmanuel is a proud and enthusiastic member of the Democratic Leadership Council--whose sole purpose is to make sure that progressive Democrats never take over the Democratic Party.

Emmanuel spent DLC money getting Tammy Duckworth the nomination for the IL CD 6 seat. She doesn't even live in the district. She's a wounded veteran of Bush's war who has zero political experience.

But it was important to the DLC to defeat Christine Cegelis, a progressive who damned near beat Henry Hyde out of that seat in 2004 and was running hard and could have easily beat the Repuke in November.

The money Emmanuel spent to defeat Cegelis could have been better spent helping Democratic Party contenders in other CD's instead of spending $100K or so to defeat a good progressive Democrat in IL CD 6.

The DLC is responsible for NAFTA, CAFTA, and favors outsourcing American jobs, in case you didn't know. They are Repukes in Democrat's clothes.

So what was it that you thought was so damned hot about Emmanuel?

by lobdillj on 09/18/2006 03:44:04 PM EST

 Display: