Political Cortex: Brain Food for the Body Politic

But no longer can Allen be viewed as an aberration. Increasingly, Republicans are having to deny accusations of racism. From Tom Tancredo standing behind a Confederate flag singing "Dixie" with the members of the League of the South, to candidates supported by the Minuteman having to explain pictures of skinheads carrying Nazi flags as they patrol the border, or endorsements from the KKK , from Vernon Robinson's racist campaign ads in North Carolina, or the RSNC ads run in the RI primary, racism is becoming a major topic of discussion.

But should this really surprise us.

In order to understand how an inordinate amount of racism can be concentrated in one political party, one must look back over the last half century or so and see how the modern Republican Party was born.

Throughout the New Deal years of Democratic dominance, racism was the national norm. Yet it's most extreme proponents were evenly dispersed between the two major parties. The Democrats had the racists of the Old South, tied to the ideals of the Confederacy and segregation. The Republican Party contained the blueblood racism of country clubs and private estates, of those who divided their world by class, race and religion.

In the 1950's this dynamic began to shift. A rift emerged in the Democratic Party over civil rights leading to Strom Thurman's Dixiecrat breakaway. But perhaps a more subtle shift was going on within the Republican Party. A new thread of racism began running through the party as those whom Nixon would later call the "silent majority" of white suburban voters who had fled the nation's urban centers to escape "urban decay" and quite frankly people of color, started joining the party. Yet the balance between the parties remained the same for the most part throughout the sixties.

In the late sixties and early seventies everything changed as the modern Republican majority was cobbled together through a coalition of diverse groups with differing agendas and goals. It began with Nixon's Southern Strategy to woo disaffected Dixiecrats from the Democratic majority. After the late sixties and the final absorption of newly franchised minorities into the Democratic Party a major transition began.  Throughout the period, large blocks of lifelong Southern Democrats, opposing their party's support of civil rights, switched parties and joined the Republican ranks. With them came the seeds of racism in today's Republican Party.  

Later in the 80's, Reagan went after another disaffected group, the "Reagan Democrats." Made up of white working and middleclass Americans, and union workers, Reagan took advantage of a backlash against school bussing, desegregation, affirmative action and many of the other programs and policies that grew out of the civil rights, women's rights, gay rights and youth movements to bring a new group into his party. But with this group also came some more seeds of racism.  

With the absorption of these two groups the face of the party was transformed. Reagan could now appeal to his new base with tales of "Welfare Queens" in order to gain support of longtime conservative goals like disassembling the social welfare system. GHW Bush could use Willie Horton to get elected.

This situation has existed for about the last twenty-five years. Social and fiscal conservative need only wrap their ideas in a thin veil of racism and then with a wink and a nod present them to their new found friends. We see it with affirmative action, school vouchers, immigration, welfare reform, and even foreign policy. If a racial component can be found and somehow exploited, the policy can be sold.

But this situation has always been a deal with the devil. No political party can use race so flagrantly and continue to garner support from a growingly diverse American people. Ergo the new push by some to close the borders and stop the "browning of America."

Increasingly there is a Republican backlash against "multiculturalism" and an insistence on linguistic and cultural purity. That is because there is no more powerful weapon against racism than diversity. It is no wonder that some of the most racist elements of society now find themselves drawn to the anti-immigration movement.

The question now at hand in the light of the Allen revelations and everything else that's been going on over the last few years is: How long can reasonable Republicans hold their noses and ignore what's going on, and perhaps most importantly, keep their party viable without it going entirely off the deep end ?  

If those in the party who do not attest to Allen's or Tancredo's brand of racism do not do something soon their party will not survive, and if it does, it will certainly not be anything they would ever want to be a part of.

From: Migra Matters - Progressive Immigration Reform