Sponsors

Why Does the U.S.A. Spend More on War/Defense than all Other Nations Combined? Email Print

The answer to that question is simple!  War preparations are big business.  It involves billions in air defense.

Take Boeing's $40 billion air tanker aircraft, allowing the aircraft tanker to refuel in the air.  When the $40 billion contract went to a French company located in Toulouse, France, the Seattle based Boeing Company was outraged and demanded congressional hearings.  

Then there are two big war business giants - Halliburton and Bechtel.  Halliburton benefited in the Iraq War debacle to the tune of billions of dollars.  Cheney, the U.S. vice president, worked for Halliburton at one time and his services provided millions for his bank account.  

There was some superficial debate regarding the "conflict of interest" factor when after being a Halliburton CEO, and then when he became vice president Halliburton was provided with governmental contracts benefited by no-bid contractual deals, to show the company's loyalty to big bucks instead of the U.S.A.  The Halliburton Company fled to Darfur to cut their U.S. tax obligations.

The World War II death toll of 50 million human beings caused some nations to declare that they wanted to stop using war to solve nations' serious disagreements.  However, the major world powers after World War II went right along with development of atomic weapons, moving on to nuclear weapons testing.

Russia and the U.S.A. were locked in Cold War frenzy.  However, atomic and nuclear testing agreements were eventually signed by both the U.S.A. and Russia.  Nuclear weapons stockpiles were to a large extent destroyed.  For a brief span of time it appeared that the frightening fears of a nuclear holocaust had been calmed.  

But this feeling did not last long.  War profits were too tempting.  Vietnam became the focal point of the well orchestrated fear campaign.  Slogans such as "the domino effect" were born and the media carried the message "If we don't stop them in Vietnam, all Asia will fall like a row of dominos."  

The flag waving, knee jerk dittoheads were at the front of the patriotic parade.  Even Robert McNamara has finally admitted that there was no way to win the ill-fated Vietnam War.  

Naturally the brave men who did their nation's bidding, going to war in Vietnam, many suffering horrifying injuries, that thousands providing the ultimate sacrifice find it difficult or impossible to believe that the Vietnam War was a betrayal.  This fact in no way minimized the bravery, dedication and loyalty of Vietnam vets or Vietnam death victims.

It was hoped that the U.S. would never launch a war without valid reasons, a war that could only be justified if the U.S. was attacked or threatened.

The war machine brigade recognized that after Vietnam, those who appreciated the sacrifices made by Vietnam vets would never be duplicated by misguided warmongers, chafing at the bit, salivating just thinking of juicy war profits.  

Enter George Bush, whose existence as president of the U.S. was challenged by those patriotic U.S. citizens who were demanding time to carefully analyze voting irregularities.  Bush is referred to by many loyal U.S. citizens as the White House resident, not the president.  

When the September 11 attacks on the World Trade Center took place, U.S. Republican leaders had already considered an attack on Iraq.  Now, without deep analysis and a non-partisan investigation, George Bush's moment in U.S. history was self-evident.  

In the infamous State of the Union message Bush presented a well orchestrated fear campaign, using the long time ultimate fear of the U.S. being the victim of a nuclear attack.

"We have knowledge of Saddam developing nuclear weapons," Bush declared, wide-eyed and with great intensity.  "We know Saddam has weapons of mass destruction which threaten the U.S.A."

The war cry had been sounded.  Every profiteer of war materials listened with rapt attention.  The Iraq War debacle had begun.  George Bush's legacy was sealed.

On March 13, 2008, on Keith Olbermann's MSNBC TV show, a new clip of George Bush vigorously waving his hand as he disembarked from Air Force One was shown.  

Bush's statement regarding the Afghanistan War was flashed in white letters across the TV screen.  Bush said words to this effect, that if he was a young man he might consider fighting in Afghanistan a romantic adventure.

When he had such a chance to fight in a "romantic adventure" that the younger Bush declared a necessary battle to turn back the scourge of Communism we know what  happened.  Dad Poppy got him a coveted position in the Texas Air National Guard, jumping the queue over many more qualified applicants.

When it came time for flyer George W. Bush to fly solo over the city of Houston he disappeared, going AWOL -- when Dan Rather and associates at CBS dared to track down this story Rather and his cohorts were fired.

So much for Bush's idea of romantic war adventure; so much for democracy in the corporate media jungle.        


KEYWORDS: , ,

Sign up for a Complimentary Member Account... Join the community! It's fast. And it'll allow you to take advantage of all this site's great features!

< Does the Bush Administration Want War or Peace? | Hillary's Presidential Speed Course for Obama >
 Display:
It's clearly evident, if you think about it with an open mind for just a moment, the answer to your question is very simple.  For reasons as yet unclear, a very small fraction of the human population, less than 5%, has managed to become the ruling force over the remaining 95%.  That statistic is quite astounding just as it is but when you take a little time to learn something about that 5% it becomes terrifying to say the least.  The people who make all the decisions leading to wars, starvation, poverty, life and death for millions are nothing more or less than certifiable sociopaths!  To put it even more simply, these beings are evil.  They not only feel no remorse for the horrors they perpetrate, they actually revel in them.
Unfortunately the scientific community doesn't believe in evil as a real state of being.  They give it a lot of technical names and make up many "conditions" and call them psychopathologies in an effort to avoid admitting that some entities are just plain evil.
The monsters that now own America and most of planet Earth simply don't care about anything beyond the pathological, insatiable lust they harbor for their own immediate gratification.  This small minority of us are genuinely evil creatures that actually take joy in the awareness of their loathsome and inhuman actions.  They literally worship money and power and will stop at absolutely nothing to obtain more no matter how much they already have or how much suffering and death they cause.  How can such a tiny fraction of the human population wield so much power and cause so much harm?

by RW Posner on 03/22/2008 10:31:58 PM EST

in the past about the frightening one-sidedness in U.S. asset ownership and expect to do so many times in the future.  Yes, when this occurs we are dealing in a frightening world run by sociopaths, and hence we reach such a result.  Thanks for sending us your perceptive insights, which are appreciated.

by Bob Kendall on 03/24/2008 01:34:22 PM EST

[ Parent ]
the pleasures left in life are becoming few and small.  This oasis of rational communication is one of them.  One worries over how much longer such sanctuaries will survive.

With gratitude,
R.W. Posner

by RW Posner on 03/29/2008 12:43:02 AM EST

[ Parent ]
to be vigilant in communication.We see what has happened on radio with Clear Channel and know that the corporate giants are seeking to same kind of changes for the Internet.  These efforts must be strongly challenged.  We cannot afford a nation filled with Limbaugh dittoheads.

by Bob Kendall on 03/29/2008 02:56:35 AM EST

[ Parent ]
 Display: