Sponsors

Hillary's Presidential Speed Course for Obama Email Print

Those attempting to determine the Obama factor in the 2008 Democratic Party presidential sweepstakes have an easy road to travel.

It has puzzled some how Hillary Clinton, ordained by most of the mainstream media as being the winner before the initial competition in the form of the Iowa Caucuses occurred, based on numbers appears well on her way to being upset by Barack Obama, a recent Illinois state legislator who did not enter major national politics before being elected to the U.S. Senate just four short years ago.

Obama's meteoric rise is tied into amateurish blundering by a Clinton campaign that received such mainstream media boosting that important columnists and commentators interviewed sang Clinton's early debate performances and declared that she was winning them regularly and decisively.

A large legion of voters, many of them young and attuning themselves for the first time to the political process, refused to be conned into making a decision based on flimsy media propaganda.  For one thing, with enough candidates on stage to constitute a political "cattle call," how can any one candidate decisively win such joint appearance efforts?

As for the Clinton strategy, it was based on the declaration that the candidate was "ready on day one" to assume the presidency.  Clinton continues to repeat this same refrain, long after an astute campaign would have adjusted the message based on the fact that there was clamor in the air for change and that Obama was responding to that opportunity.

Also, the whole "ready on day one" refrain was first used by George Bush the Elder in the infamous "Willie Horton campaign" of 1988 against Michael Dukakis, in which racism reared its ugly head through the media strategy of Lee Atwater, known for parlaying racist and anti-Semitic smears to help win Republican political victories.  

If there was one thing that the new wave of voters who pledged money to the Obama campaign via the Internet in large numbers did not want, it was resuming connections to the Bush political family.  

In addition to using Bush the Elder's 1988 campaign refrain, Bill Clinton, eagerly seeing himself returning to presidential power via his wife's perceived election, got so carried away that he proposed international fence mending excursions with none other than the same Bush the Elder.

Even Bush the Elder was shocked by Clinton's suggestion.  He saw such an exercise as a tacit admission that his son had made major blunders on the world stage that needed correcting.  While true enough, Bush the Elder could hardly engage in actions involving  trouble shooting regarding his son's international errors.

Another area where Clinton strategy boomeranged was the decision to spend large sums of money early in the primary season in an effort to lock up the nomination.  Failure to realize this objective left Clinton well behind Obama in the important television advertising as well as caucus competitions.

Recently Hillary Clinton and her chain of command have created another major tactical blunder.  

While continuing to advance the "day one" argument that should have been scrapped for a more resonant theme, there was the recognition that, while she has consistently registered a 48% negative rating in national polling, Obama has been able to establish himself as a viable vehicle for change with Democrats, Independents, and even some liberal Republicans.

Realizing that she needs a boost among the very groups where Obama has been polling strongest, including younger voters, Clinton floated the suggestion that it might be possible for the current rivals to be on the same presidential ticket.

One notable problem immediately surfaced concerning Hillary's voicing the possibility of a Clinton-Obama ticket.  As she has drawn increasingly behind Obama in the delegate count Clinton's campaign has sought to make the case with increasing stridence and repetition that the senator from Illinois lacks her readiness and preparation for the presidency.

As this contradiction was raised the Clinton campaign became enmeshed in a sea of turbulence.  After all, if Obama is as ill-prepared as the Clinton television commercials indicate, then how can he be offered on the same ticket with the candidate being touted as "ready on day one" to assume command?

Well, it works this way.  While Obama is not ready on his own to assume the presidency as is Clinton, this situation could change.  The prescription is that once Clinton locks up the nomination she will then, along with others in her entourage, concentrate on getting Obama ready for the presidency should he be needed.

This would be some speed learning process, something like the old Evelyn Wood Speed Reading Course applied to preparing a candidate criticized as markedly unprepared to  assume command if needed after being sworn in on January 20, 2009.

Take heart, Senator Obama.  While they deem you unprepared the Hillary Clinton Speed Course on the presidency will have you ready in record time!  


KEYWORDS: , , ,

Sign up for a Complimentary Member Account... Join the community! It's fast. And it'll allow you to take advantage of all this site's great features!

< Why Does the U.S.A. Spend More on War/Defense than all Other Nations Combined? | How the U.S. Economy Collapsed with Corruption Everywhere >
 Display:
Let me start by saying I believe there is still a very strong possibility there will not be a presidential election in 2008.  Why is dubya always grinning that same smug grin he grinned when he told everyone in 2000 that Florida was a sure thing?   Given NATIONAL SECURITY PRESIDENTIAL DIRECTIVE/NSPD 51 and HOMELAND SECURITY PRESIDENTIAL DIRECTIVE/HSPD-20 it would take only the tiniest disturbance to give Bush an excuse to declare martial law.  Another, much less drastic, false flag terrorist attack would be more than enough.
In any case, it seems unlikely that any of the candidates being forced upon American citizens by the media and the rest of the corpratocracy will have any positive affect on the future.  Humanity has set itself on the course to oblivion.  At best we can hope that a small remnant of the human race will survive somewhere to repopulate the Earth after the current extinction event has run its course.  One can only hope that these few survivors will be free of the genetic defects that led to Libertarianism and Free Market Capitalism.  It would seem that society can’t survive the sociopath.

by RW Posner on 03/21/2008 07:01:53 PM EST

very much aware of in view of what we have seen in the last two presidential elections, where fraud was perpetrated to change the result.  With all these directives in place there is that frightening possibility that, if the election is not close enough to "reasonably steal it" as happened in 2000 and 2004 based on evidence of those who took the trouble to study those elections, we could have some could of "terrorist attack" or "gigantic terrorist threat" making it necessary for Bush and Cheney to hold onto power.  I suspect I will be writing more about this subject sometime since I have mentioned this subject before.  In the post-9/11 climate anything like this appears possible.  

by Bill Hare on 03/24/2008 01:26:03 PM EST

[ Parent ]
 Display: