Sponsors

Overpopulation is the Earth's Number One Problem Email Print

In a startling article on excess population, Johann Hari in his column in London's Independent, revealed some sobering statistics:

"Every year world population grows by 75 million people - equivalent to another Britain and Ireland.  At the turn of the 18th century there were 600 million people on earth.  At the turn of this century there will be 6.6 billion."

This colossal overpopulation will find ever more people chasing after a diminishing degree of any resources left on the planet.  

During Ronald Reagan's presidency family planning funds for poor, enormously over-populated nations were cut off completely.  When television shows the poor fighting for food being dropped from planes for starving people, you get some idea what an inhumane decision that was.  

This ethical, moral question must be asked - Is it better to educate with family planning to limit death by starvation, or see the haunted faces and the bloated bellies of children and parents dying of starvation?

A human being who has not lost the humanity of possessing a conscience is outraged by the overpopulation generating death by starvation.

The article by Johann Hari continued:

"Dave Foreman called us `humanpox' and wrote:  `The aids epidemic, rather than being a scourge, is a welcome development in the inevitable reduction of human population.  If (it) didn't exist, medical environmentalists would have to invent it.'"

That is an opinion I cannot agree with.

Where is world population growing fastest?

Hari points to:  "Sub-Saharan Africa, rural China and Bangladesh."

Amazingly these areas, Hari points out, have virtually no carbon emissions, and pitiful food consumption.  The gap between these areas and Great Britain are astounding.

Hari states, "To be responsible for as many gas emissions as one British person a Cambodian woman would need to have 262 children."

Hari adds that our lifestyle with refrigerators full of food and SUV's in our driveway along with cars for mom, dad and each child is gobbling up natural resources to an alarming degree plus polluting every crowded city.

Thomas Malthus, the 18th century demographer, predicted mass starvation.  His prediction made long ago is coming true.  

Mr. Hari reaches for a positive outlook, but it is a long stretch.  He looks to technological potential achievements when he declares:

"It is not quite true to say there is a diminishing amount of resources, because the genius of human beings is to find new ways to use what is there.  Two centuries ago, nobody could have conceived that the sun's rays or the waves in the ocean were a resource to be used - but solar and tidal power make it so."

For solutions he suggests that some people might think governments should take authority before it is too late.  He points out, "China has bragged that its greatest contribution is the fight against global warming has been its policy of punishment, imprisoning or sterilizing women who have more than one child."

Hari suggests what he feels is a far better way.  He suggests that women have control over their own bodies through contraception and abortion.

Hari concludes, revealing, "The United Nations fund for population activities has calculated that 350 million women in the poorest countries didn't want their last child, but didn't have the means to prevent it.  We should be helping them by building a global anti-Vatican (viewpoint), distributing the pill."

The pill might minimize starvations and suffering.  That, after all, is an ethical answer to a timeless dilemma.


KEYWORDS: , , ,

Sign up for a Complimentary Member Account... Join the community! It's fast. And it'll allow you to take advantage of all this site's great features!

< Corporate CEO's Average is $15.2 Million a Year? | Support Congressman Wexler: The Bush-Cheney Criminal Enterprise Must be Confronted Now! >
 Display:
Actually, the real problem is not overpopulation but underpopulation.

Take a look at the statistics. For example, Europe and Russia are rapidly being depopulated. The number of elderly keeps getting larger while the number of native-born young people has shrunk dramatically. As a result, these countries are losing their work force and encouraging immigration from vibrantly growing countries in North Africa and the Middle East to maintain their economies.

There is no reason why economic growth and population growth cannot coexist in the same country.

Russia, Canada and Australia are populated very thinly for the geographic area they take up on the world map. Even Saudi Arabia--one country with really fast population growth (4 million in 1960, 40 million in 2006)--still has vast stretches of empty, unused territory and will not run into space problems for a good forty years.

Math also helps us to see the real picture. The entire population of the United States could easily fit inside the state of Texas with a lavish 300-acre ranch for each man, woman and child. Theoretically, the world's population of 6.6 billion could even fit comfortably inside Russia with more than a 200-acre farm apiece. You can calculate all this from NationMaster.

In addition, intensive farming methods will significantly increase land space for our future generations.

I don't think it would be wise or responsible for other countries to imitate Saudi Arabia. However, I say, bring on the population growth.

Justin

by Justin Soutar on 06/02/2008 02:44:35 PM EST

 Display: