Why Would Obama Even Consider Timothy F. Geithner for Treasury Secretary? Email Print

That is the question!  Considering the New York Times January 14 article by Jackie Calmes datelined from Washington, D.C.:

"Timothy F. Geithner, President-Elect Barack Obama's choice for Treasury Secretary, failed to pay more than $34,000 in federal taxes over several years early this decade, and also faces questions about the employment of a former household employee, suddenly complicating what had seemed to be an easy confirmation process in the Senate."

With the U.S. economy in collapse does it make sense to appoint someone to be Secretary of the Treasury who hasn't paid taxes of $34,000 over several years?

Geithner explains it this way.  He was working for the International Monetary Fund, and simply neglected to pay his self-employment tax.  He blames this on erroneous advice from his accountant.

That is puzzling because the International Monetary Fund was sending him payments for 50 percent of his self-employment tax.  Even more disturbing, he had acknowledged these payments in an agreement he signed to pay this tax (using the 50 percent of the tax IMF hadn't paid).  Was it a memory lapse?  He says it was wrong advice from his accountant.

On the front page of the January 23 New York Times, Jackie Calmes wrote the following:

"Timothy F. Geithner, who moved closer to confirmation as Treasury Secretary on Thursday, told senators that President Obama believed China was 'manipulating' its currency, suggesting a more confrontational stance than under the Bush administration."

Nobody complained about the U.S. dollar currency manipulation when former Fed Chief Alan Greenspan lowered the interest rate to a 40-year low.  

Seniors who didn't trust Wall Street or scam artists like Bernard Madoff and his crew, finally exposed for their $50 billion Ponzi scheme, went to banks for safety, getting as low as 2 percent on their certificates of deposit.  

Seniors were legally ripped off, with the British pound twice as high and the Euro between 40-50 percent higher than the U.S. dollar, American citizens were forced to compete in real estate with hard currency foreigners due to dollar manipulation.

As Calmes further stated in the January 23 article:

"The statement which is sure to anger the Chinese government comes at a particularly sensitive time, with economies in both the United States and China weakening and tension already rising around the globe over trade.  The United States moreover is increasingly dependent on China to finance its ballooning deficit."

With Obama claiming the Iraq War is costing the U.S. $10 billion a month, the U.S. borrows from China to let the Iraq War go on, for what Alan Greenspan indicated in "Turbulent Times" was "largely about oil."

How ironic that the U.S. borrows from a Communist country to fund fighting its wars.  That is reality.

As Calmes continues:

"The National Association of Manufacturers, whose members have pushed administrations to get tougher with China, was pleased, but also cautious given the potential for a confrontation that could exacerbate global woes.

"Some market strategists said Mr. Geithner's statement inflamed a contentious issue unnecessarily given that China exports and economy is falling into recession.

"Edward Yarden, an independent analyst referring to Henry M. Paulson Jr., the just-departed Treasury Secretary, 'The Chinese trade surplus is shrinking dramatically and China's economy is shrinking dramatically and China's economy is falling into recession.  I think it really wasn't necessary.  It doesn't accomplish anything.'

"Mr. Paulson initiated a round of strategic talks with the Chinese and on his watch the Chinese allowed the Yuan to depreciate nearly 20 percent."

One senator summed it all up succinctly:

"Republican Senator Michael B. Enzi of Wyoming said, 'I'm really disappointed that we're even voting on this, given that other nominees had been disqualified for less.'"    


KEYWORDS: , ,

Sign up for a Complimentary Member Account... Join the community! It's fast. And it'll allow you to take advantage of all this site's great features!

< Harvey Milk: An American Hero | Obama, Holder: Stand Firm in Wake of Republican Extortion Demands >
 Display:
One aspect that is often overlooked in contracts of employment is the restrictive covenant. This is becoming an important aspect of labor contracts, especially in the electronic storage of data becomes the most common method of documentation in organizations.

by mariajonesd on 02/03/2011 07:35:11 AM EST

I could found out excellent and useful information from you guys. I appreciate your work here. I like this type of post because it will be useful for everyone. Thanks.
Web Design Qatar|Website Design Qatar

by eswari on 08/16/2011 03:13:33 AM EST

 Display: