Debt Ridden U.S.A. Keeps Printing Money by the Billions (as China Backs Out of Buying U.S. Bonds) Email Print

Ahmed Ayad of Redmond, Washington in the January 7 Seattle Post-Intelligencer wrote the following letter to the editors:

"Your coverage of the current conflict in Gaza is a testament to failure of professional, honest journalism and of simple human conscience.

"You choose to focus on rockets of a legitimate resistance to an illegitimate occupation and breaches of `truce', ignoring the continual blockade of a besieged population and a nonstop, humanitarian crisis.  You parrot that `Hamas has broke the truce' line and ignore the documented 160 plus times Israel has breached such truce through the blockade and through targeted and blanket killings.  You ignore the numerous international resolutions condemning the occupation, the expansions, the killings and the many multiples more that are stonewalled by the blind support of the current and previous U.S. governments that went even beyond the dreams of the bloodiest leader of the Israeli Likud.  You print letters supporting the only point of view they know about, the only view you give them in a sad cycle of ignorance aided and abetted by your coverage and parroted `opinions' and `editorials'.

"It is shameful to see Jews, even Israeli Jews, who cannot afford supporting such atrocities on their conscience express this loudly and forcefully while the U.S. media and the U.S. public are sedated.

"It is shameful that I have to advise my friends who want to learn about the issue to go somewhere else for honest reporting, anywhere else but the U.S. news source."

Freedom of the press is a basic principle of living in a nation where freedom is heralded.

That is why newspapers are such an integral part of society, which claims to welcome freedom of expression, why has the freedom of the press been disallowed all too often?

The New York Times January 6 editorial stated, "Israel must immediately allow foreign journalists access to Gaza, as the Israeli high court ruled on December 31.  As in every war zone, reporting by journalists -- and human rights monitors, as well -- can discourage abuse, and is essential to full public understanding of the conflict."

Could this Israeli incursion into Gaza backfire?  This is the question this New York Times editorial asks.

The editorial continues:

"With the ground incursion into Gaza, Israel has gambled that it can finally silence Hamas rockets that have terrorized its people for years.  We sympathize with that goal.  But we are concerned that short term success on the battlefield might encourage the Israelis to keep pressing further and longer in an attempt to decimate Hamas and wrest Gaza from its grip."

The reality is, Hamas rejects Israeli's existence and Israel rejects the existence of Hamas.

Hamas labels Israelis as terrorists, and the Israelis label Hamas as terrorists.

Jimmy Carter's book "The Blood of Abraham" traces the Arab-Israeli conflict through the centuries in what is basically a clash rooted in an ancient family feud.  

It is glaringly apparent that only cooler heads could ever resolve this tragic bloody saga.

Name-calling and refusal to even acknowledge the legitimate existence of Israel or Hamas has led to a literal dead end.

As the world watches horrifying scenes of death of civilians in Gaza, men, women and children on nightly news, as well as the deaths of civilians from rockets landing in Israel, it is obvious this killing cycle will end only when international peacekeepers recognize the democratic rights of each side, and establish enforcement, with penalties if violence erupts.

With the U.S. bogged down in wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, its resources are stretched to the limit.  Alan Greenspan, ex Fed chief, in his book "Age of Turbulence" states, "Everyone knows the Iraq War is largely about oil."

The U.S. lost its moral leadership over oil.  The Iraq War, going on more than 6 years, is the longest in U.S. history.  

The orchestrated media boasts of peace arriving at last in Iraq are not true.

The nightly TV news displaying an endless cycle of killings in Iraq betrays this false boast.

With the U.S. sinking in its national debt now over $10 trillion, the bankrupt U.S. must borrow from China to fund the Iraq and Afghanistan wars.

But now, the U.S.A.'s biggest bailout nation, China in a January 8 New York Times front page headlined story declares:

"China losing taste for debt from the U.S.  Key lender finds uses for money at home."

The most shattering economic question of all must be asked:

Will the U.S. keep printing money with nothing back of it but the paper it's printed on?  


KEYWORDS: , ,

Sign up for a Complimentary Member Account... Join the community! It's fast. And it'll allow you to take advantage of all this site's great features!

< Don't Equate Historical Conservatism With Bush-Cheney Radicalism | Gaza and the Endless Tragedy of War >
 Display:
1. Everyone needs to read Jimmy Carter's book, "The Blood of Abraham".

2. What happens when a government continues to print money with nothing to back it up? President-Elect Obama in 2009 faces an even greater dilemma than President Roosevelt in 1933.

"Live simply that others may simply live."

by nrdthxpr on 01/10/2009 01:35:29 PM EST

your response.  You are correct that Obama is facing a herculean task and meanwhile the right insists that Bush-Cheney weren't so bad after all.

by Bob Kendall on 01/10/2009 02:01:02 PM EST

[ Parent ]
The reason there is confusion about the Israeli Palestinian crisis is because we are framing the debate by asking the WRONG question. We are being told to ask, "Does Israel have the right to protect itself?" To which the answer is a resounding "Yes."

To PROPERLY frame the debate we should be asking: "Does Israel have the right to own two concentration camps, Gaza and the West Bank?" To which the answer is a resounding "No."

by Mylegacy on 01/10/2009 05:00:50 PM EST

out of one's posterior section, you should start by trying this yourself.  Your response was "windbag" not the article.  What you quote as a sign of the author being out of kilter is the same thing the UN Secretary General and members of the Security Council are saying, along with people from all over the world.  

That point is that serious negotiations need to be undertaken to avoid bloodshed.  That was the statement that you totally twisted.  By not slamming someone, as you were apparently hoping to see, I was not attempting to cite fault but point out the need for leadership and negotiation, which is what the world community is seeking.

Look up the word "diatribe" and you will see that it fits your response and not my article.  By the way, you cannot have it both ways.  By being upset that I was not sharply condemning in the way you preferred does not suggest a diatribe.  That is encompassed by personal attacks, which is what you were doing.  

With the attack of cobra bile that has prevented you with approaching this article in an emotionally immature way, you were unable to see the connection between the thrust of U.S. leadership being absent when it was needed on this issue, as it has been absent on the economic front when a huge debt was run up.

On this site we try and observe rules of decorum on language and deportment when it comes to disagreement.  If this is the way you like to "communicate" there are other sites where this type of exchange is enjoyed.  If this is your style then one of those sites would be recommended.  

by Bob Kendall on 01/11/2009 08:04:06 PM EST

Very good post. I would like to mark it on digg. The information is very educative. Thanks for sharing with us mate.
adjustable beds |online dating

by lewis on 07/23/2009 12:01:25 PM EST

Yes, this article help me so much. It make me know about politics. Thank you very much.

Anxiety Relieve | Hypnosis to Stop Smoking | Find Cheap Airline Tickets

by curiousboy on 12/15/2010 01:09:08 AM EST

[ Parent ]
 Display: