Political Cortex: Brain Food for the Body Politic

"For months, Prime Minister Nuri Kamal-al Maliki, who is seeking another term as Iraq prepares to hold national elections in January, has painstakingly tried to present Iraq as having turned a corner on the violence that threatened to tear the country apart in 2006 and 2007."

A few days ago on Anderson Cooper's CNN nightly news show that self-acknowledged neoconservative military affairs expert Bill Bennett made the case for more U.S. troops in Afghanistan.  In doing so Bennett sought to buttress his argument that he was backing a strategy that had achieved success in Iraq.

Bennett has followed a long line of neocons delivering hawkish pro-military pronouncements after a pattern of vigilant college deferments when the Vietnam War they championed from the sidelines sent other young Americans in their stead.  

Bill Bennett along with Dick Cheney, Paul Wolfowitz, and Richard Perle might have chosen the deferment strategy regarding Vietnam War service, but that did not stop them from advocating in Bennett's case and plotting in the others the Iraq War.

It was essential to attack Iraq to punish its dictator Saddam Hussein for the 9/11 attacks.  Never mind that he had nothing to do with them and was a sworn enemy of al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden.  

Given the right propaganda climate it sounded good to many.  Let us all, in the meantime, gloss over those very private meetings in Dick Cheney's office involving the major forces of Halliburton, Bechtel, Monsanto and others to divide Iraq's oil and other profits before the first shock and awe attacks commenced.

Bennett the other night demonstrated the same kind of reassuring glibness he did while serving as America's spokesman on morality before it was discovered that this paragon of righteous zeal squandered millions of dollars on gambling tables.

Bennett's righteous zeal also extended to white collar crime.  He ignored the obvious link of regulatory curbing by two of his political idols, Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush, instead blaming Bill Clinton.  

William Bennett insisted that such egregious white collar crime resulted from the bad example Clinton set with the Monica Lewinsky scandal.  His self-righteousness blended with an all pervasive simplicity that never threatened to invade the level of  reason.

Neocons such as Bennett assiduously dodge factual reality.  Nowhere is this trait more obvious than with the Iraq War.  How many of them discuss the conflict's death toll?  

How often are Iraq War death totals discussed in the mainstream media?  Is this a current discussion point with Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck?  Isn't it more fun to instead discuss Acorn?

The death total according to the respected British medical journal Lancet stands currently at 1,339,771.  It is reported that 2 million Iraqis fled the country as refugees since the war began.  Another estimated 1.8 million lost their homes but continue to live in Iraq.

Neocons prefer initiating and cheering conflict from safe sideline perspectives.  William Kristol enthusiastically cheered Nixon's deadly bombing raids on Cambodia from the safety of his Harvard University dorm.  He has been comparably bullish on the Iraq War.

What price has been visited on the Iraqi people as a result of a conflict they did not seek?  The neocons prefer not to know.  

What about the legality of the Iraq War?  Should those who launched it be tried at the International Court of Justice at The Hague?

Rather than answer any of the aforementioned, isn't it much easier to bellow ad infinitum about Lewinsky and Acorn?