Should Bush be Prosecuted for Alleged Criminal Acts? Email Print

The Orange County, California Register on January 25 carried this headline in a guest column by Konrad Moore, Chief Deputy Public Defender in Kern County:

OBAMA SHOULD PARDON BUSH

The guest columnist went on to explain:

"Those who desire to see former President George W. Bush prosecuted for alleged criminal acts, including extraordinary rendition, warrantless wiretaps, denying habeas corpus and sanctioned torture ignore the tradition and responsibilities of the president.

"However objectionable the president's conduct, the idea of a president being criminally tried or jailed remains rightfully troublesome.

"America may not recognize a monarch, or even a formal aristocracy, but whatever his foibles, the president remains iconic."

How interesting that Konrad Moore considers Mr. George W. Bush an icon.  I would respectfully disagree, and I think the majority of Americans don't think of George W. Bush as an icon, as reflected by his very low rating at 23 percent.

Instead, Mr. Moore, the vast majority of the U.S. citizenry think because he brought the nation to its economic knees, asking China and Saudi Arabia to buy U.S. bonds to bail out of the economic pit Bush's Iraq War spending spree, along with bank and business deregulation he condoned.

Breaking international treaties was something beyond Obama's power to ignore for when he accepted the role of president, he became responsible for upholding laws national and international the Bush Republican led administration broke with impunity.

Konrad Moore continued:

"Whether it might ever be appropriate to criminally prosecute a president remains a question for a different day.  We need not presently concern ourselves with the practical challenges where, as here, the political will is absent.

"Instead, the answer is that President Obama should pardon former President Bush.  At once a pardon would reflect benevolence and grace/ Bury the hatchet, we will not tear at old wounds.

"It would also unequivocally convey that which the world already recognizes, the past eight years of our nation's history were characterized by terrible abuses of individual liberties that define our nation.  We recognize our mistakes, just as we promise a better future."

The problem with Konrad Moore's statement "we recognize our mistakes" leaves a big question unanswered.  Does George W. Bush acknowledge the Iraq War was a mistake?

Does George W. Bush acknowledge killing hundreds of thousands of Iraqis, displacing millions of Iraqis was a tragedy, demolishing Iraq's infrastructure was unnecessary in an unneeded war.

If he doesn't publicly acknowledge these monumental missteps, how on earth can he be pardoned by Obama?  You've got a colossal problem with your benevolent solution.

When I asked an Egyptian the other day about this very issue, he quietly said, "Only the God of the universe can pardon George Bush for the Iraq War!"

My viewpoint is that Bush, Cheney and Rice should be brought before the World Court at The Hague to determine if they have violated the agreement for conducting a war the U.S. was signatory to years ago.

In the New York Times February 6 article John Schwartz told of claims of torture abroad, facing a court test:

"A case to be heard in San Francisco on Monday could provide an early look at whether President Obama will fully break with the previous administration on questions of government secrecy, concerning the transfer of terrorism suspects to countries where they may face torture.

"The hearing grows out of a lawsuit filed on behalf of Ethiopian native Binyam Mohammed and four other detainees against a subsidiary of Boeing Company.  The suit maintains that the subsidiary Jeppesen Data Plan helped arrange rendition flights that took the detainees to nations where they say they were tortured."

Under George W. Bush, not only was Iraq a victim of an unneeded attack, but has torture become as symbolic of Bush style Americana as mom and apple pie?

That issue must be decided by Obama.      


KEYWORDS: , ,

Sign up for a Complimentary Member Account... Join the community! It's fast. And it'll allow you to take advantage of all this site's great features!

< Bush's Iraq War Spending Spree and Greenspan's Shrinking Dollar Kill U.S. Economy | What Else Could You Call the Post "Chimp" Cartoon but Racist? >
 Display:
The problem is the legal precedent each president sets for future administrations. Bush, under Cheney's advice, broke multiple laws on the excuse of a national emergency. Was he justified? If prosecuted, his lawyers would make a plausible case that he was. Even the pack of lies he fed Congress and the people could be plausibly explained away by citing the examples of Lincoln, Wilson and Roosevelt and their management of war emergencies. So, why go through a bitterly divisive  ;trial without real hope of a conviction, especially now when the nation is wallowing in an economic crash, we need to be united as reasonably possible. Instead of prosecuting Bush, the Justice Department should charge tho se corporate white collar criminals who are rewarding their failure by voting themselves multi-milli on dollar bonuses and retirement packages with U.S. tax dollars!

"Live simply that others may simply live."

by nrdthxpr on 02/19/2009 04:43:07 AM EST

personally been tortured you might have another viewpoint.  Experience makes the best teacher.  International laws that we signed were violated with impunity.  The question is, do you believe in breaking contracts you signed?  If you do, I can thoroughly understand your viewpoint.

by Bob Kendall on 02/19/2009 12:48:13 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Bush certainly deserves to be prosecuted, but can he be convicted? Even though Clinton should never have been impeached, he definitely did lie under oath, yet he was acquitted in a back room deal. The same would happen with Bush.

"Live simply that others may simply live."

by nrdthxpr on 02/21/2009 02:21:16 PM EST

[ Parent ]
There are lots of sources of price reduction birkenstock sandals, however to find them you might need to look around a small inside your region.Many individuals sell birkenstock gizeh through on-line auctions, many at drastically decreased prices from retail, quite possibly on present year models. Since eBayers do not need to spend cash on establishing their own individual retail environment, they are willing to provide cheaper and discounted costs on birkenstock Madrid or any other boots and shoes by Birkenstock.

by misshua99 on 01/13/2011 03:08:55 AM EST

 Display: